Where does “Good enough” fit on the scale? Asking for a friend…
$argon2id$v=19$m=512,t=256,p=1$J+Ahj0kCcBnA79zlyTtRFw$k0z+vi3mIdYTYaL5OT+h5Hac/u/802P13G9ls0Ct6zE
Where does “Good enough” fit on the scale? Asking for a friend…
I think they’re using this style: https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-does-eat-hot-chip-and-lie-mean-the-viral-copypasta-and-meme-explained
I don’t think I have any great answers for you, but I have two thoughts:
That reads like it’s hanging trying mount a swap volume. Did any hardware change recently? Particularly like hard drive layout or something?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DwbjFx_8swY There are competing theories on what instrument the “Jazz Man” was likely to play…
Because it’s the Internet, I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not, so… It’s from Doctor Who.
Technically, Midway is considered uninhabited, so while I wouldn’t dream of telling them to fuck off, most census measurements already do…
And American Samoa.
“But John Galt says we can make a rich person utopia if we want to!”
Just in case the sarcasm wasn’t clear: objectivism dumb.
Not to discount your rice idea, but isn’t this essentially the directions for Rice-A-Roni?
Great news, you still can: https://zombo.com/
Didn’t see any mention yet, so…
Useless use of cat
!
It’s a reference to the “gamergate” controversy from like…2015? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_(harassment_campaign)
The emoluments clause? https://www.britannica.com/story/what-is-the-emoluments-clause
This is some straight-up Alex Jones shit… I imagine they have “sad human eyes”, too.
Thanks. Updated.
A number of people replied about Reagan’s work ending state mental institutions, and made a lot of good points. One interesting aspect of that was https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinstitutionalisation. In the 60s and 70s, mental health professionals were advocating for moving from a institution-based model of care (a la “One Flew Over the Cookoo’s Nest”) to a community-based model (groups like https://www.reachinc.org/ basically follow this model). The basic thrust: ensuring that individuals are a part of a community, and care is tailored to the individual. It’s very well-meaning at its core. By the lat 70s, deinstitutionalization had (to some extent) become doctrine with experts working with disabled individuals. And for good reason! A number of early studies showed promising results! So come the 80s and Reagan. Reagan has an easy excuse for closing down institutions: experts in th field even recommend it! There’s one really important caveat, though: experts recommended diverting the funding the institutions had received into community-based support (again, see the link above for Reach as an example of how they imagined this funding being dispersed). Reagan…just cut the funding. So really, he did a “No Child Left Behind” 20 years earlier! Which, as I type it out…is even shittier. He gave false hope that he was actually going to do something great for mentally disabled people, and instead threw them on the street. Man. Reagan really sucked.
Side note: there are groups like Reach all over the US and the world, and they all could use help. Volunteers, funding, etc. A quick bit of research and you may meet some incredible people in your local community.
Honestly? I was trying too hard.
“Good enough” is my go-to.
It’s the suffix that hits hardest:
~at least that’s what my friend that I’m asking for definitely said~