Different person, but I’m at work procrastinating on my job. I want to look at some of these games without guessing which ones are nsfw

I like to joke about recursion and how it gets overused as a “good” programming practice, but I genuinely have a solid understanding of it and find it pretty intuitive… In OOP. I cannot wrap my head around tail recursion

So the white spaces between the states, are they basically like international waters?

Got it, so French freedom is white men telling women what they’re allowed to wear.

“made of honor” sounds dangerously close to saying that Kahless isn’t the supreme beacon of honor

Yes, the ultimate punishment for cats is to be held and loved and petted and kissed. It sears their chaos gland

I still remember when it was a big deal that Gangnam Style broke 1 billion views

Good, I’m glad they’re scared. I hope another CEO gets luigi’d before the end of the year. Let’s make a good US tradition for once

They even got the squad upgrade, so know they can add another Rico

Fuck yea Johnny, get 'em!

Look at moneybags over here with a stockpile of ramen

Where can I find elderbel. I demand to know.

In my first campaign, we won 391 to 8

I don’t know if you knew this, but organizing unions is literally an intersection between political beliefs and political reality.

You don’t know anything about my political beliefs. You want to put me in a box so you can safely ignore me without analyzing your political beliefs. If unserious people are the ones forming radically militant unions, then I’d rather be with the unserious people instead of your brand of “serious”

And what gave that impression?

If you want nuance, I can give it to you. I’ve successfully formed a union that spans across 3 states, including Texas. It’s one of the largest tech unions in North America. We got it through political messaging. Generally I consider anyone that can successfully get people to join a union for political reasons a pretty informed and nuanced person. But what do I know.

You don’t know shit about me. Don’t pretend you can ascribe what I know from a single comment.

I’m aware of coreboot. I was not aware that the project managed to increase support to include configurations for all chips that predate IME and PSP. Last I recall when I looked at coreboot, there were chips that they didn’t think could ever be supported, even without nannyware. I wasn’t pushing a bullshit problem, I was raising legitimate concerns for problems that I didn’t know had solutions. If you don’t want people to raise honest, good faith concerns to you then you better be extremely vigilant that you don’t step in shit.

You act like you’re the only one that understands information security. I took a security class for my computer science degree too. Productive conversation cannot be had when you strut around arrogantly dismissing everyone that disagrees with you.

The fix was made. And it was done without writing microcode.

Spectre was a microcode patch. Meltdown was a kernel patch, so in firmware. Only AMD bothered to fix chips that fit within your timeframe. The fix has not been made for the chips you want to use.

Patching is not the only way to control for a vuln

You aren’t going to stop branch prediction with clever tricks. These are hardware level flaws. Patching is the only way to completely mitigate these flaws.