Self Proclaimed Internet user and Administrator of Reddthat
Oh I was wrong, after further reading this looks to be a lot better than what I was thinking.
I must have been thinking about another methodology of attempted privacy over a dataset.
Before I start reading, if this has anything to do with differential privacy, I’m going to be disappointed.
2nd best reporting in.
A faster db. Just the regular performance benefits, https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-16-released-2715/
Also, Lemmy is built against v16 (now) so at some point it will eventually no longer JustWork
The script will be useless to you, besides for referencing what to do.
Export, remove pg15, install pg16, import. I think you can streamline with both installed at once as they correctly version. You could also use the in place upgrade. Aptly named: pg_upgradeclusters
But updating to 0.19.4, you do not need to go to pg16… but… you should, because of the benefits!
Congratulations! 👏 Happy B-day and here’s to many more to my across the river friends 🎉
Ps. The video works and is great!
Spoilers > quotes bold italics codeics
Jsjsjsjsjsjsjajsjs
Jjejejejejejejej
2nd level ::: spoiler Title Jdjdjdjdjdjdjdjdjdjdjd :::
The downvotes you can see (on this post) are from accounts on your instance then. As this post is semi inflammatory it is highly likely to have garnered some downvotes.
Edit: I guess I was wrong regarding the logic of how downvotes work when we block them. As the http request (used too?) return an error when responding to a downvote. I’ll have to look at it again. As the only way it was/is 15, is if:
Ah. I see you too enjoy the debian approach