• @KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    98 months ago

    That’s ridiculous. The disks were far more than the cameras. And why be wasteful of those costs I’ve already shouldered? I am as miserly as I can be when spending on my infrastructure.

    • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      -118 months ago

      If you can’t afford the disks I’m wondering how you can afford a house

      But I mean, that’s the price of security cameras. You just gotta accept you will need to cycle disks every once in a while, and delete old data.

      • @KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        108 months ago

        Why do you think I cannot afford more disks? Or a house? You incorrectly assume too much and seem unnecessarily argumentative.

        I have already bought the disks and see no reason to work them overly hard for camera surveillance. I worked out another solution that others might be interested in. That’s what this thread is about.

        • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          -9
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Maybe I should have clarified a bit then, but

          I really don’t see why you would need to own security cameras if you don’t own a house? If you’re renting that’s not your job, and if you live in an apartment… Well, why do you need security cameras in your apartment? Unless you own the building?

          My point was mostly that like, a couple of disks is not a big expense, and not something I feel is worth fussing over, personally.

          • @4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            “If you’re renting that’s not your job”

            Yes, I’d love my landlord to have 24/7 recordings of all my activities, that’s not fucking creepy at all

            I swear some of you don’t really think much outside of figuring out what’s convenient for you

            • @SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Well I did not refer to record inside your home. Usually security cams are outside facing your front lawn, if anything. Also with you having access to the recordings, not the landlord controlling it.

          • @KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            58 months ago

            I am positive plenty of renters run surveillance cameras for a myriad of valid reasons. Maybe they don’t trust their landlord or they are nonresponsive, or simply don’t want their belongings stolen or messed with, or have troublesome neighbors or roommates, etc. The world is big and varied with many solid reasons. Open up your scope a bit.

            • Cosmic Cleric
              link
              fedilink
              English
              88 months ago

              I am positive plenty of renters run surveillance cameras for a myriad of valid reasons.

              My neighbor got one because their delivery packages kept getting stolen.

          • @Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            I didn’t realize living in a rented house/apartment puts up a magic barrier that keeps out all security concerns that owners have to worry about.

            Also, for security video storage, you don’t (or at least shouldn’t) just slap in some generic drives and go. There are specialized drives made for the always on, always active setup you need for that, and they are much more expensive than standard drives. I just upgraded my NAS with 4 8TB drives, and those cost me just under $1k.

      • Lev_Astov
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        Perhaps he can afford things because he knows how to apply his knowledge to be more frugal with things like this. If you can work around disk lifespan limitations, you’d be wasteful not to do so.