ummthatguy@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoWhat About Q?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageWhat About Q?lemmy.worldummthatguy@lemmy.world to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-text
After making this, I realized “What About Barclay?” would be a better candidate, but Q works for this scene.
minus-squareummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoApparently, since 1962. Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s.
minus-squareHeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 months agoI’m working on a punctuation mark that looks like pelvic thrusting but it’s hard to get it on print
minus-squareummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoIt gets that way when you handle it like that.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoConsidering the question mark is at least as old as the fifth century, I’d call 1962 new.
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months ago Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s. What’s wrong with “⸮”?
Apparently, since 1962. Now we just need a better mark to denote sarcasm than /s.
I’m working on a punctuation mark that looks like pelvic thrusting but it’s hard to get it on print
It gets that way when you handle it like that.
Considering the question mark is at least as old as the fifth century, I’d call 1962 new.
What’s wrong with “⸮”?