• @OpenStars
    link
    English
    214 months ago

    What do you mean 2020 - isn’t this the year 2020 part 5!? :-P

    • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t really get how things are supposed to work now. Covid still exists, and the vaccine offers incomplete protection. But apparently things are back to normal for most people? Even I don’t wear my N95 all day while I’m in the office, but when I wear it in crowded places I’m one of very few people doing that.

      • @the_brownie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Covid is now endemic and no longer an epidemic/pandemic, so the need to contain cases is less immediately important. I, too, still like to wear masks in super crowded places or if I’m not feeling well but it is rare.

        • ClaraBecker@threads.net
          link
          fedilink
          204 months ago

          Just tacking on, Covid has changed. It’s, by and large, more infectious and less deadly than it was in 2020 on top of being well studied. Panicking about a potential 10% mortality rate from an unknown rapidly spreading virus was reasonable. Panicking about a known low mortality rate virus is unnecessary.

          That said, n95 has been a game changer for me. Between allergies and reducing my time with the flu, Covid, and colds, it’s been amazing. Feel free to prove how incredible your immune system is, insecure folks. I’ll be over here enjoying my clear sinuses.

          • @troglodytis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            84 months ago

            Taking precautions against a novel deadly virus with unknown transmission vectors is not panic. One can certainly panic while doing so.

            Once more was learned, our precaution protocols became more focused.

          • @kralk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            63 months ago

            You made some good points, but just to say death is not the only outcome to worry about. Long covid is devastating lives.

      • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        It’s an interesting and difficult question to answer.

        My personal take: we collectively went through a really difficult time. The virus killed a lot of people; over 7 million globally according to the WHO. The vaccines were instrumental in slowing the spread and keeping people safer than they would’ve been without them.

        The vaccines and science bought us time. We learned how to treat people, and we also gathered data on what the virus does to people. Basically, we now ‘know’ how most people will react to an infection. And since corona is here to stay, most of us will have gone through an infection once or twice by now.

        So today, corona is less scary than when it started. We’ve lived through it, we understand it, we have measures to protect the weakest from it. It’s now a part of life much like the flu.

        We’ll never be back to a world without corona. But we’ve learned to live with the virus for now.

      • @RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The virus has weakened considerably. For most people, it really is just another flu. I live with my sister, she just got it this past week. Neither me nor her boyfriend got sick, and I’m totally negative. She’s mostly recovered now after a week. Also, I was a few months out of date with the booster. She was totally out of date.

      • @OpenStars
        link
        English
        23 months ago

        I counted it off on my fingers to triple-check my sources oh ah, I mean, thank you!:-)

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I guess I should have specified that centuries are zero indexed. Like we’re in the 21st century, but the year is 2024. The 1900’s were the 20th century, etc…

            • @threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              Maybe I’ve misunderstood what “zero indexed” means, but I didn’t think centuries were either. Didn’t we go from the 1st century BCE straight to the 1st century CE? I don’t think there was a zeroth century, or else we would not have the mismatch of the 1900s being the 20th century, etc.

                • @threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  If I understand correctly, years 100 BCE to 1 BCE were the “first century BCE”, and years 1 CE to 100 CE were the “first century”. If there was no “zeroth” century, how can the centuries be zero indexed?

                  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    I mean it’s not like it’s official or anything, I was just making an observation. But the reason is because the years in the first century don’t have a 1 in front of them. A century ends at 99. The 21st century started in 2000. The 20th century started in 1900. The 1st century started in 001. Maybe the first century is an exception and didn’t end until 100, idk. But they would still leave 99 years without a hundreds character.