- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
Democrats have poured more than $100m (£77m) in donations into Vice-President Kamala Harris’ presidential bid since President Joe Biden dropped out of the race on Sunday, her campaign says.
The tally was boosted by what her team calls a record 24-hour period of fundraising - $81m raised.
During that timeframe, more than 888,000 people donated sums of up to $200 each, according to progressive donation platform ActBlue.
Donors who had pulled back their funding over concerns about Mr Biden’s age have said they now intend to resume their support for the party.
The surge in donations in the 24-hour period after Mr Biden quit the race was the single biggest for online contributions to Democrats since 2020, according to the New York Times.
I think I have a new found respect for Biden. This is easily one of the best power plays of all time. Stepping down must have been tough, especially if he couldn’t remember why he should step down.
The mind and body may go, but the heart remains. He sacrificed his own aspirations to give Kamala the best possible chance of burying Trump. Legendary final chapter, 10/10, would vote Dem again.
Oh, Joe Biden still knows what he is doing, unlike the orange felon/rapist who spews bullshit and lies non-stop.
You’re a lying, dog-faced pony soldier!
It’s kinda insane to me that any presidential candidate is pulling in 81 million dollars. Why do they possibly need that much money for campaigning? It seems absurd.
Please think of the media owner billionaires enjoying the most privileged and luxurious life that earth has to offer.
They need that money desperately, because it’s not enough for them to win, they require that everyone else be as miserable as they are.
It seems crazy to me too. The limits on spending for election campaigns are far smaller in some other countries, even after adjusting for population size.
Without passing judgment on whether it’s wise or not (though… clearly the current paradigm is not), the legal rationale is that the free speech implications of the US Constitution’s first amendment are extremely broad and permissive, even more so for explicitly political speech, and that money spent on political campaigns is effectively money spent to disseminate political speech. Restrictions therefore are very few, very light, and even where they exist they are very easy to effectively work around while remaining legal.
To add to others, they also have to run field offices in so many places, especially battlegrounds. It’s not just ads, you need locals.
Imagine opening up 50+ offices in each major European nation, staffed with both volunteers and paid folk.
deleted by creator
Ka-Moolah
Aw heck, maybe I’ll even kick in a couple bucks
You know, someone out there is counting the number of donators as well as the total, so your little chip has value there. Mine’s in.
Democracy and decency thanks you.
maybe I’ll even kick in a couple bucks
musk is kicking in millions so millions need to kick in a few bucks or musk will rule you.
Why did the media so quickly forget Trumps quid pro quo with the oil industry for a billion dollars. IANAL but isn’t that a blatant crime?
Saving me n other people a click
You mean like his other 9 million blatant felonies, for which he received no punishment?
Rakin’ in da bux.