“This would be better if it were covered in rust”
deleted by creator
Gee whiz, that pun was basic!
They can’t all be perls before swine
i C what you did there
Maybe too BASIC.
They’ve played us for absolute fools!
This engine is not the best practice
This engine is an antipattern.
We’re dissing Unity here right?
Could also be your least favorite container engine. Or rules engine. Man, we really like to call things engines don’t we?
deleted by creator
Not gonna lie, I just threw a random joke in there, I never even touched Unity
deleted by creator
Oh lucky shot then XD
I don’t know a lot of game dev, care to educate me on the rights and wrongs of each of the engines?
deleted by creator
This engine is not idiomatic.
“Documentation considered harmful” - my coworkers probably.
deleted by creator
It perfectly makes sense if you think like me.
– a deranged programmer
– a deranged programmer
Aren’t we all?
Using “self documenting” as a blanket excuse to not document things that need it is inexcusable, yes, but I’d rather work on code written by somebody who seriously thinks about how to make it clean and self documenting, and then documents whatever still needs it as well, than on code written by somebody who doesn’t make that effort, but documents heavily. And as for people who claim they’re documenting everything, when the documentation is
function fooTheBar() // foos the bar, they can eat a bag of docs.deleted by creator
bool ticket2387_ac3 = true; // TODO if (!ticket2387_ac3) return;ticket is too exposed, what if they reverse engineer the name? just use t2387ac3 instead it saves time
facts
My coworkers do document the code:
/// Returns a list of foos, given a bar. fn get_foos_from_bar(bar: Bar)
Perl has entered the chat.
No, that’s just some random line noise.
ifelse eatme
