• FiskFisk33
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      hmm, how would the receiving instance verify? what happens if I send 100 random hashes?

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        This is literally already a problem. I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings. There are generally a bunch of these functional vulnerabilities in the AP trust model which are only mitigated by the current lack of scale. Work needs to be put into reworking the trust model, not exposing user telemetry to even more people.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings.

          Well you can do that for a little bit, until your instance gets found out and it gets defederated. And you need to pay for a new domain if you want to do it again. So the current system actually makes it cost real money to do this spam you’re talking about.

        • FiskFisk33
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          well, since the voting is public it’s easy to remove your votes and block your instance after the fact

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Each instance could store a static private key used to encrypt all usernames in that instance maybe?