ZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoElon Musk Threatens To Sue Anti-Defamation League For X’s Lost Ad Revenuewww.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1386arrow-down131
arrow-up1355arrow-down1external-linkElon Musk Threatens To Sue Anti-Defamation League For X’s Lost Ad Revenuewww.huffpost.comZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareblazera@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago As a result, your restaurant loses business. “the most profitable in the world.” It just dont work the way you say it does.
minus-squareMelllvarlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhether the restaurant remains profitable is beside the point. If you can demonstrate that even one customer chose not to visit your restaurant as a result of my lies then I could be liable for defamation.
minus-squareblazera@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah im the one that came in here saying it was against the law. Its a bad law. The most profitable business in the world clearly has not been harmed. But it should be.
minus-squareMelllvarlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAs I said, I’m not suggesting that Musk’s claim is reasonable. I’m saying that the law he purports to have been harmed under is reasonable.
“the most profitable in the world.”
It just dont work the way you say it does.
Whether the restaurant remains profitable is beside the point. If you can demonstrate that even one customer chose not to visit your restaurant as a result of my lies then I could be liable for defamation.
Yeah im the one that came in here saying it was against the law. Its a bad law. The most profitable business in the world clearly has not been harmed.
But it should be.
As I said, I’m not suggesting that Musk’s claim is reasonable. I’m saying that the law he purports to have been harmed under is reasonable.