RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 days agoYeshexbear.netimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down11
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageYeshexbear.netRNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to urbanism@hexbear.netEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up70arrow-down1·9 days agoI like the implication that trains aren’t vehicles.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·9 days agoNo? Where is that implied?
minus-squareanarcho_blinkenist [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·9 days agoright in the headline, where it didn’t say “another vehicle”
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·9 days agoMe: “I was complented by a guy I didn’t know” You: so you must be a woman then. It absolutely doesn’t imply that. YOU are reading into it.
I like the implication that trains aren’t vehicles.
No? Where is that implied?
right in the headline, where it didn’t say “another vehicle”
Me: “I was complented by a guy I didn’t know”
You: so you must be a woman then.
It absolutely doesn’t imply that. YOU are reading into it.