• antimongo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m adjacent to this problem, so I have a little context, but am not an expert at all.

    To my knowledge, we don’t have granular control over panels. So we can shut off legs of a plant, but that’s a lot of power to be moving all at once.

    Instead, prices are set to encourage commercial customers to intake more power incrementally. This has a smoother result on the grid, less chance of destabilizing.

    A customer like a data center could wait to perform defragmentation or a backup or something until the price of power hits a cheap or negative number.

    • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks that’s helpful.

      But right…?

      Solar plants can be reduced to rationalize supply.

      To my understanding. The bigger issue is you can’t as effectively do this with other non-renewables like coal/gas… so this not a solar problem but a problem of legacy power plants.

      So stupid. The narrative as well.

      • antimongo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea, more control over the panels will help with the overgeneration issue.

        But there’s other issues like ramping supply to meet peak demand and general generation during non-solar hours that still have to be addressed.

        Each have interesting proposals on how to solve them, but they haven’t been developed to the point that they’re ready to be put onto the grid at a large scale.