• PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Of course there’s the best option which is an non-occupancy tax that goes up exponentially for each additional property you’re sitting on for speculation.

    That right there would be a hard counter to wallstreet hoovering in the housing market.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s like you’re not even considering the feelings of the millionaires and billionaires with 72 houses each and I for one just won’t stand for it.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        58 minutes ago

        I can’t wait for the “rational” peoples argument against taxing the rich. Will it be something like a slippery slope fallacy? Maybe it will be “it’s unfair to thoses that only just recently got rich.” I’m thinking though they will go with, “it’s not going to make a meaningful difference” then try and sell us trickle down in some new way.

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If a landlord who actually takes their job as servant to their tenants seriously gets some efficiency of scale - say enough units to justify a full time maintenance person who is available on call to support tenant issues - I don’t want to punish them for that. Surely we can develop metrics to identify predatory landlords that are more accurate than number of properties.