Flying Squid@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 hours agoElon Musk Apparently Managed to Sue Unilever Into Advertising on X Againgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down110cross-posted to: ethicalconsumerism@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1176arrow-down1external-linkElon Musk Apparently Managed to Sue Unilever Into Advertising on X Againgizmodo.comFlying Squid@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square43fedilinkcross-posted to: ethicalconsumerism@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·6 hours agoOh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic “Cost not worth the price” reasoning still applies.
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·6 hours agoyou spelled ‘losing potential profits not worth fighting nazis’ wrong
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·6 hours agoYeah, I mean, that’s the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like “not helping genocide along” or “preventing fascism”.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·6 hours agoSee my response to @Docus. They own half the brands in half the houses in the world.
Oh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic “Cost not worth the price” reasoning still applies.
you spelled ‘losing potential profits not worth fighting nazis’ wrong
Yeah, I mean, that’s the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like “not helping genocide along” or “preventing fascism”.
See my response to @Docus. They own half the brands in half the houses in the world.