run from it, dread it, beans arrive all the same

bean bean-think chickpea

    • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have actually discussed this paper at length before on this site, but I think I’ll go for the simple punch. Wood was the director for Pfizer in their Animal Health division, which supplies the American meat industry with antibiotics and is actively creating a major crisis for global health (antibiotic resistant bacteria) for the sake of profit. Perhaps that is why he likes writing negatively about something that could slash his bottom line thinking-about-it

      And being the director for a division this big and important in a pharma company means you are, very strictly, a shithead ghoul. If you look into him further, he has significant investments in anything beef-farming related.

      http://lifesciencessummit.co.nz/speaker/paul-wood-ao/ more info on this guy, who is a literal ghoul

        • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The team used the emerging ‘net protein contribution’ concept to measure the quality and quantity of protein created by cattle compared to the protein they eat, looking at both grain-fed cattle and grass-fed cattle that may eat small amounts of grain.

          They found typical Australian grain-fed beef production systems contribute almost twice the human- edible protein they consume, while grass-fed systems produce almost 1600 times.

          It means the beef sector now has benchmark figures for the protein it contributes to the food supply, which will help track improvements and compare efficiency to other protein production systems when they are assessed using the method.

          Red meat is often criticised as having a very large footprint, taking up land that could be used to grow crops for human food, or eating grain that humans could be eating instead, otherwise known as the ‘feed versus food debate’.

          However, CSIRO livestock systems scientist Dr Dean Thomas said Australian beef production is efficient at converting both low quality protein in grains that humans can eat, as well as protein in grass that humans can’t eat, into high quality protein for human nutrition.

          “Cattle are efficient upcyclers of grass and other feedstuffs not just in terms of the quality of protein they create. They contribute a greater amount of protein to our food system than is used in their production as well,” Dr Thomas said.

          re: supporting beef farming

          https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/News/2021/December/CSIRO-sets-beef-benchmark-for-protein-production

          https://www.csiro.au/en/work-with-us/services/consultancy-strategic-advice-services/CSIRO-futures/Agriculture-and-Food/Australias-Protein-Roadmap

          their own roadmap even has a disproportionate increase in meat production, and much of their plant based funding is going straight into the mouths of that cattle

          if you want to read my previous posts, you can search it, im not going to research everything for you.

      • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes he is a shithead ghoul. But the people financing cultivated meat are also ghouls (effective altruists). I would also agree with what he’s saying here, having worked in a cultivatedeat company. The problem is we’re trying to grow single cells that don’t want to grow by themselves. They have no immune system, and no hormone production. So you have to supply those things exogenously, and run it in a sterile process. The Humbird report mentioned in the article on The Counter linked above does a good job of explaining it, I also tried to explain it in my own article, which is a top level comment.

        • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          More than 90% of the funding for lab grown meat comes from China not effective altruists. Similar to green energy, the effective altruists are just following in the wake of China

          • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I apologize, I was not actually aware of China’s research into CM, my viewpoint thus far was mainly constrained to a western one.

          • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I apologize, I was not actually aware of China’s research into CM, my viewpoint thus far was mainly constrained to a western one.

        • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even when you have single cells that want to grow by themselves like yeast its very hard to mantain a sterile process. Thats why lager became the most common beer type. It alows you to run bio reactors at very cold temperatures to give the desired yeast time to outcompete the others. And thus you need to spend less efort mantaining a sterile situation.

          I cant imagine how hard is to mantain a sterile enviorment with meat cells.

    • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fundamental chemical engineering reality prevents it from scaling to extent needed for production of commodity protein

      Some people I know in the general field and a PhD chemist and a factory process engineer I talked with do disagree with that a bit.

      Something I do see as chance are future generation bioreactors in any case.

      it fails as a way to avoid animal exploitation because fetal bovine serum vampired out of cow fetuses is still required to make the stuff.

      That is true but can be substituted in the future.

      The main points that help us now are changes in consumption, resilience and an end of capitalism.

        • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do hope it is worth a good deal. I know that the field is too far away from my expertise for me to really get what is and isn’t possible so I have to heavily lean on people who do.

      • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The cells still need to be supplied with growth factors, whether that comes from FBS or not. Producing growth factors in vitro also requires sterile, pharmaceutical grade production systems.

        Chemical engineering or not, my belief is that fundamental biological reality will prevent it from being scalable, especially the problem of sterility.

    • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is a very good article, thanks for sharing. The humbird report was also what opened my eyes to the real situation, it’s a good read for anyone interested