• ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    In really it’s probably a mix that totals to around 90% of the people making these pronouncements are either bots, paid trolls from enemy nations, nihilists, or the equivalent. The remaining 10% probably have a genuine belief that voting for Harris makes them complicit in the genocide the Israeli government and its military are committing. They’re incorrect, on many levels, but that is probably their genuine belief.

    We must always vote for the lesser evil because that’s what the real world is, from the most negative point of view: reducing evil and suffering. We know some of the things we’re doing today will be seen as evil by our progeny. We don’t know others.

    A Harris administration will be the most likely to reduce the suffering of Palestinians, the most likely to force the Israeli government and military to end the genocide, and the most likely to make real strides toward middle east peace.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You come off as someone who had the protocols of the elders of Zion read to you in your sleep every night without your knowledge

      In really it’s probably a mix that totals to around 90% of the people making these pronouncements are either bots, paid trolls from enemy nations, nihilists, or the equivalent.

      All you’re missing is that one magic word

      • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Whereas, and forgive me if I’m mistakenly assuming you’re advocating not voting for Harris, your worldview is just defeating. Every candidate but Harris will ensure that Palestinian suffering increases. Not voting will deny Harris a vote, therefore necessarily increase the odds of someone else winning and Palestinian suffering increasing. Palestinians are saying to vote for Harris. Votjng for a third party (all choices there, by the way, either actively endorse Trump (RFK Jr.) or are funded by Russia (Stein) so supports the genocide of Ukrainians) remove a vote for Harris and increase the odds of Palestinian suffering increasing. There is no scenario where if you’re an American citizen you can be a neutral bystander.

        At this point, if you don’t vote for Harris, you’re voting for ethnic cleansing and genocide, quite possibly at home as well as abroad.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          All I’m advocating is for people to vote for whoever fits their values best, whether thats third party, democrat, republican, or not voting at all if there really isnt any valid ones.

          The problem is people who have the perspective that you vote against the worst candidate rather than for the best one, in my opinion.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The problem is people who have the perspective that you vote against the worst candidate rather than for the best one, in my opinion.

            Have you somehow not heard of “first past the post”? The people who have that perspective, with regard to the US presidential race, have the correct perspective.

            Third party votes don’t matter in FPTP. Until that changes, a vote for third party works in the Republican candidates favor, thanks to FPTP, plus the electoral college.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sort of, its a self fulfilling perspective to believe the two party system is about picking the least worst of the two.

              If the majority of people would vote for their best party/candidate then things would change from getting worse to getting better.

              Im of the opinion peoples perspectives need to change before policy or regulation will, but I wouldnt say not to try and change it through election reform.

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Every candidate but Harris will ensure that Palestinian suffering increases.

          Harris has not said anything concrete about holding Israel back. Or stopping shipments.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Except she absolutely has.

            She’s called for the investigations needed to legally stop the funding.

            Because there’s a full legal process that needs to happen to overrule Congress on allocated funding.

            Trump was impeached over fucking with funds allocated by Congress to a foreign government.

            A Harris win means a push for a cease fire. Especially if Democrats win the House and Senate.

            A Trump win on the other hand… Well. He’s actually on record as pro-genocide.

      • kmaismith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m torn on how to approach this, i’m left with a couple of options:

        A) so Trump would somehow be even less self defeating?

        B) are you suggesting we should all spontaneously rise up and overthrow the military industrial complex?

        C) if you think this world view is self defeating then:

        C.1) you owe some clarifying thoughts as to how you see a measured response to the existing democratic systems as self defeating

        C.2) you appear to be making yourself out as someone who idealizes violence and oppression

        C.3) you appear to be using contrarian language with the explicit purpose of dragging down the mood of the conversation. Quit that shit