• DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Obscure fact” is a weird way to say “literally the defining characteristics.”

    But you’re right, it’s far, far more embarrassing for an American to not be able to define liberal, or at least vaguely recognize its meaning in this context.

    • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Liberal, in US English, is almost solely used to describe left of center politics. For the definition of liberal that you’re referring to the common term is Libertarian.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The trouble I have with a definition like that is that it raises another question: what’s ‘center’?

        And if you define that by a point between hard right and hard left, then as the right goes even farther into their own reactionary bubble, diving even farther right, the “center” skews to the right to account for it.

        • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There really hasn’t been much change in the hard right and hard left in the United States through its history. We’ve just fluctuated back and forth on what parts you dare say out loud.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leaving aside for the moment that the most common “libertarian” identifies as a “classical liberal” how do you people keep having dumber takes?

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You aren’t exactly a novel contributor to the broader discussion either. All you are doing is claiming shit, not backing anything up, and telling others to Google it while being a snide and condescending prick.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just ignore him. He is the type of dude that thinks arguing about the prescriptive versus descriptive use of the word “literally” is a personality.