It is vague, but it does rule out “man in a dress and wig”. I mean men in dresses and wigs is great and all. They are free to do what they want. They just aren’t women, and I will never call them such.
It’s not only vague, it’s completely wrong. You can’t over-rule biology with court rulings, and biology doesn’t care what the concept of “male” and “female” means to humans.
Please form a single file line for the government sanctioned genitalia check. Each one of you could be a man in a dress and wig and it’s super important to me to know which.
Now define “biological female”.
Right? Is this phenotypic or genotypic?
phenowhazzle?
Is it the DNA or T and A?
DNA or TNA he says, that’s gold! 😂
Total Nucleic Acid (mixed DNA and RNA extracted from a sample together)
“Annoying outgrowth around the pussy”
It is vague, but it does rule out “man in a dress and wig”. I mean men in dresses and wigs is great and all. They are free to do what they want. They just aren’t women, and I will never call them such.
It’s not only vague, it’s completely wrong. You can’t over-rule biology with court rulings, and biology doesn’t care what the concept of “male” and “female” means to humans.
Please form a single file line for the government sanctioned genitalia check. Each one of you could be a man in a dress and wig and it’s super important to me to know which.