• OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because there are more Republicans in the house right now and they didn’t vote for him.

            • pips@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              If there is a quorum in the chamber but more Democrats than Republicans present, in theory they could successfully vote for a Democratic Speaker while in the minority. There is nothing that says the Speaker of the House has to be a member of the party that holds the majority. However, Republicans/the Speaker Pro Tem will almost definitely make sure this doesn’t happen. I say almost definitely because, as we’ve seen, they’re not that great at strategy these days.

            • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              No, they meant the democrats nominated him, or put him forward as their candidate for speaker. Not that he won the vote.

        • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because Dems don’t have the majority. Jeffries was often the top vote getter during the speaker voting in January, though, since the Republican coalition is fracturing, much like now. Plurality doesn’t get you the speaker’s gavel, though.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the non-Fredumb Cuckoo’s in the Republican party actually come to an agreement with the Democrats on a speaker, as they should, then they could.

      At this point though the entire Republican party is more concerned with people’s genitals and reproduction than governing.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      that’s probably why they did it. They’d only need a handful of moderates to join them in the vote; and it kind of sounds like they’ve been making deals in the background.