Outside of typical remarks from Donald Trump, JD Vance and Mike Johnson and a Fox News report, party stayed mum

Republican voices were mostly silent as No Kings rallies and marches against Trump administration policies unfurled on Saturday, many in the spirit of a street party that countered the “hate America” depiction advanced by senior members of the party.

Instead of provocation, there were marching bands, huge banners with “we the people” references to the US constitution, and protesters wearing inflatable costumes, particularly frogs, which have emerged as a sign of resistance.

It was the third mass mobilization since Trump’s return to the White House and came against the backdrop of a government shutdown that not only has closed federal programs and services but is testing the core balance of power, as an aggressive executive confronts Congress and the courts in ways that protest organizers warn are a slide toward authoritarianism.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was supposed to be this dark, violent uprising of slavering feral ANTIFA Commies, and instead, it was a just a huge national street party/ MAGA Roast that MAGAs weren’t invited to.

      Now they have to explain to their cult how wrong they were about the left being violent and hating America, without looking like their feeling are hurt for not being included in the fun.

      • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        The right wing media is just waiting for the handful of police reports to come in from the weekend to fixate upon, and talk about non stop, so they can make that “violent uprising” a reality for their viewers.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          4 months ago

          I just heard an ABC reporter saying that the protests were non-violent, “for the most part.”

          “FOR THE MOST PART?” He said that without pointing out a single instance of it, and I haven’t heard of any reports of violence. So why does he have to suggest, on national TV, that there was at least some violence, somewhere? All that does is feed MAGA lies. Now that can say that the protests were violent, they heard it on ABC, and they’d be accurate.

          News organizations, whether left or right, should be required to be accurate.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        the whol anti anti facist thing is a pretty daring stance for trump and johnson. So funny they act like they are the real americans.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ours coincided with our Pride, they actually marched with us in the parade up to the capitol and then joined us. It was incredible, unlike anything I’ve seen in this city. Do I think Trump is going to magically be unseated? No. But let’s make a habit of this, since I am not sure voting will actually happen in 28, and we need mob size forces to be easily called up.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of these protests, especially in bigger cities, have all kinds of booths at them too. The one near me had like 6 for just one congressional candidate, one for a mayoral candidate, and multiple for revolutionary socialists/communists, along with people walking all over the rally handing out fliers about a general strike.

      Tons of people sign up for these things, or even if they don’t sign up to strike/canvass, end up changing their voting habits accordingly. A lot of local stuff can be really impactful, since a lot of the policies most directly felt by people are local policies (e.g. is the pothole in front of your house fixed? Is your rent expensive? Is there visible poverty on the streets? Are the buses slow?) rather than federal ones (e.g. “we cut billions in research grants but you’ll only really start noticing the overall effects yourself many years from now”)

      I do wish we could just get all the people going to things like this to head over to ICE facilities and block 'em day and night, but it’s a good consolation that they’re taking some other actions regardless.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Glad to hear your protests had some local political activism attached! Great place to platform and remind people that qualified candidates are everywhere!

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re silent because they know all the protestors will go back to work tomorrow. If you want to force them to acknowledge it you need to show up the next day as well.

    • FackCurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      This 💯. No kings was a protest, it is not a movement and is not trying to be a movement.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      I actually agree. The shit going down in the USA certainly deserves a General Strike.

      And that’s why unions were invented, to put that option on the table. How many % of workers are unionized in the US? Is there historical precedence of a general strike without unions?

    • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If these parades are ever to work, they need to stop being predictable. Stop giving the enemy info about them like how long they’ll last of where they’re being held. Find ways to spread the word without them finding out and make it a continuous thing that has no end in sight until demands are met. Make sure you showcase you will escalate if they feel they can safely ignore you.

      When the enemy goes low, you kick them in the face as hard as you can.

    • UltraMagnus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The tricky part about a general strike is that you dont have much room for do-overs if it turns out you don’t have the numbers you need. Protests are largely symbolic, but are also a good way for organizers to gauge how willing/able folks are to engage in more drastic action.

      If a general strike is what you think the movement should go towards, I recommend your next steps be strengthening community support systems - food banks, free clinics, shelters, etc - since these things will be needed to support a general strike (folks will choose feeding their children over political action, so make sure they can accomplish both). In the mean time, it also helps out folks who have been hit the hardest by republican and trump cuts to services.

      I highly recommend folks read up on some of ICNC’s stuff, since they focus on the practical side of nonviolent conflict.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 months ago

    Mostly silent?! Except for the video King Trunp posted of him literally shitting on Americans. Presidential enough for you??

  • drhodl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 months ago

    No shit about staying silent. Even the media is silent. The only references I can find in my news feed regarding the No Kings rallies, is local reports from small local stations. Things like this make it obvious which side the mass media is on.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s part of the propaganda strategy to pick their battles. They never speak on your terms. They only speak when they have the upper hand. Keep in mind in general they never directly acknowledge any of your talking points. Not unless they have an avenue to interject logical fallacies and pivot the dialog to their terms.

    The moment they start talking about this they lend credence to your side. It carves open space in public discourse. This is the exact same tactic they use against you. And people fall for it every time. You’re never supposed to lend credence to their trolling. You’re not supposed to feed the trolls. Yet here we are. A decade into this era of internet troll right wing politics. People started feeding the trolls and cannot help themselves.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was at a rally all day today. I saw two noteworthy attempts to counter protest the HUNDREDS of “no king” protesters that showed up in my city.

    One was a guy who wrote couchfucker propaganda on his car in chalk paint. “JD Vance 2028” or something like that. He flipped us off at 50mph. Few saw it.

    The second was a guy that brought his Charlie Kirk flag to the last 25 minutes of the protest, after 2/3rds of the no kings folks went home.

    So, one was a coward that drove by one time. One time. I think he yelled something, but since Trump supporters don’t believe in science, he didn’t realize we can’t hear shit when he’s speeding by at 50 in a 35.

    The second guy… Man, what do you even say? How about ‘what the fuck even is a Charlie Kirk flag?’ These people are mentally fucking ill. They will villainize and glorify anyone and anything. If Trump told them douchebags were a hallowed object tomorrow, they’d be lovingly calling themselves ‘douchies’ by next week.

  • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can’t believe how many people haven’t even heard of it when it’s one of the biggest protests in US history. Those left-leaning news channels sure doing their job by covering it for 5 minutes I guess. None of my friends nor 3 other people I talked to today even knew what the protest was or that it was happening until I told them about it.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of media outlets worldwide are ignoring these protests or covering them very briefly when nobody’s watching. Most likely due to influence from the US.

      • paperazzi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Most likely because the world has given up on the USA and is moving on. Your problems are well-deserved, they figure.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          First of all, I’m not an American. As much as I despise the American Empire, I hold no ill feelings towards the American people. They are as much victims here as the rest of us.

        • Routhinator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sadly we can’t be that disengaged from the US because when your economy goes under from all of this, so will most of the worlds.

          If the situation is anything like Canada in many nations, most media outlets are owned by US corps. Over half of our outlets are being controlled the same as US media.

    • MrSmiley@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Most people live their lives wholly unaware of reality. If their entertainment programming doesn’t consist of anything informational, they will never know about events except second hand from others, like your case. The silent majority doesn’t vote in elections, not because they don’t see the point, it’s because they likely had know idea there were elections.

      I had to explain to my friends what “mid-terms” were. They vote in presidential elections…

      • m0stlyharmless@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Uninformed and disinterested people are a very useful demographic to those in power. It’s also notable that even when they encounter information regarding important events, they won’t be aware of what actions they can take in response to it. Not being informed on important events and their progression also impacts how they perceive those who are taking action to change or influence those events. This can easily lead to the perception of justified responses being excessive or alarmist.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      All media are complicit. Don’t just look at one side. Both sides are causing division where there isn’t any. Hate for dollars is quite a lucrative trade in this fucked up world.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      And this is the threat posed by consolidating communication and media. Even if we want to organize a movement, we can’t communicate with each other to organize it or share it.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be honest, we shouldn’t even need Republicans to turn the tide. We just need to get people off their asses and stop pushing both sides bullshit.

    Democratic primaries will be fast approaching and now is the best time ever to support Democratic candidates like AOC (likely to primary Schumer), Mamdani, Talarico, Chakrabarti, etc. and get out the AIPAC crap.

  • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Apparently 5m people. Which is great, but we need 12.5m to make change, so the country needs to get like 700% worse

        • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafeBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          4 months ago

          3.5% is the magic number decided by people smarter than you and me. Let’s just run with that and stop making excuses for coming short.

          • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            4 months ago

            Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan are absolutely smarter than me but I still think it’s a red herring. Focusing on a number like that risks missing sight of the ultimate goal of overthrowing fascism, regardless of what it takes. Plus the math is not settled, it’s a complicated number and every situation is unique.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.5%25_rule

            • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              4 months ago

              And to quote an especially important part about one of the Author’s views from that Wikipedia article:

              (emphasis added)

              Subsequently, Chenoweth has noticed that both nonviolent and armed resistance have been decreasing in efficacy since 2010, concluding that this is the result of authoritarian regimes learning from history, coordinating with one another, and training their armies and police to discourage defections within their ranks. Consequently, Chenoweth has advised that civil resistance movements take these changes into account and alter their tactics accordingly.

              To quote even more from this publication, also by one of the authors. (emphasis also added)

              The 3.5% participation metric may be useful as a rule of thumb in most cases; however, other factors—momentum, organization, strategic leadership, and sustainability—are likely as important as large-scale participation in achieving movement success and are often precursors to achieving 3.5% participation.

              New research suggests that one nonviolent movement, Bahrain in 2011-2014, appears to have decisively failed despite achieving over 6% popular participation at its peak. This suggests that there has been at least one exception to the 3.5% rule, and that the rule is a tendency, rather than a law.

              Large peak participation size is associated with movement success. However, most mass nonviolent movements that have succeeded have done so even without achieving 3.5% popular participation.

              The key point is this:

              The 3.5% figure is a descriptive statistic based on a sample of historical movements. It is not necessarily a prescriptive one, and no one can see the future. Trying to achieve the threshold without building a broader public constituency does not guarantee success in the future.

              The very people who publicized this theory in the first place have been repeatedly, publicly trying to clarify that this is descriptive, not prescriptive, yet if you ran with the wording of 50501 and other related movements, you’d think that 3.5% is a magical number that if you pass, the administration instantly backs down. (source: 50501 - Hands Off protest statement: “History shows that when just 3.5% of the population engages in sustained peaceful resistance – transformative change is inevitable.”, emphasis added ofc)

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                The 3.5% participation metric may be useful as a rule of thumb in most cases; however, other factors—momentum, organization, strategic leadership, and sustainability—are likely as important

                Another factor is how deeply entrenched the fascists you are trying to dislodge are.

                The more levers of power they control (and the longer they control them), the stronger and more sustained the pressure against them needs to be.

              • Auli@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                People want to think if we just get to this. Umber it well change but it isn’t true. Also a protest once every couple of months don’t even think counts as a protest.

                • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It counts as protest, but not sustained protest, which is usually a decisive factor for if a protest will succeed in affecting anything. Even if every employee of a company left for a day, if they all came back the next day and resumed working, it wouldn’t be hard for the business to get back up and running, then just put systems in place to account for that in the future, but if those employees strike for months, suddenly all the business’s systems begin to fail without maintenance, customers leave because of no service, and the business goes bankrupt.

      • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafeBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        4 months ago

        3.5% is a well established number. You can choose to argue over it, but please do it with someone else.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s an observation not a hard and fast rule. It’s also rooted in data from the pre-information-age, many rules have changed.

          • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafeBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            I agree the rules have changed. It will only be harder at this point. So that 3.5% is old news and needs to go up

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          No it isn’t. Read what the authors say. One protest had 6% and it didn’t work. So no it isn’t a magical number and they have other things that are more important and have worked with less people. Also they say protests both violent and peaceful seem to be working less and less.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The author also said its a rule of thumb and not any sort of magic number that automatically triggers change.

          • klammeraffe@lemmy.cafeBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            No one actually thinks that the moment we pass the exact 3.499999999% of the population that the entire system will just switch over automatically. I can’t tell if your pedantry is spectrum or dopamine based.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m gonna bet it goes up. It did the last several times I saw early estimates for these events.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you’re not willing to show up armed, massively disrupt, or even create mild inconvenience it doesn’t matter how many people are in your cute little self-congratulatory parade.

        • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          When they report on the violence Trump is quelling, they can’t use any of this. That’s the point.

          Pay attention instead of shoving your foot into your esophagus.

          • MorallyCoffee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            So all you’ve done is redeemed your own reputation as acceptable members of the broader normie society. You could have stayed home and accomplished that.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    First of all, stop calling them Republicans. The Republican party is dead, replaced by the MAGA Party.

    The Republican foundation of Smaller Government, Lower Taxes, Responsible Economic/Fiscal Policy, Family Values, etc. has been replaced by the MAGA foundation of Treason, Corruption, Racism, White Supremacy, Rape, Pedophilia, Violence, Cowardice, Ignorance, Incompetence, and Intolerance.

    The Democrats get crazy when a MAGA calls them the “Democrat Party,” so hit them back, and make it official that the Democratic Party no longer recognizes the Republican Party, and will never refer to it again in speeches, interviews, campaign literature, etc. As far as the Democratic Party is concerned, it is now the MAGA Party.

    Then stick by it, and watch them melt down. They LOVE being Republicans, they are proud of it, after building it up in the Conservative Propaganda Machine for decades as an honorable institution. Many of them have to be uncomfortable with being sidelined by MAGA, and getting lip service from them. They already know that the Republican Party is dead, but they are afraid to say it out loud.

    So the Dems should do it, and give them their worst nightmare - they allowed the MAGAs to destroy the “Party of Lincoln.”

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      While I love the idea, they’d probably just come back and always refer to the dems as the Woke Socialist Party.

      it really only works if the media also gets onboard, and i doubt they’d get onboard with either of those.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The old “I know you are, but what am I” Defense? That’s lame and pathetic, and everybody knows it.

        And they don’t need the media to be on board. The media weren’t on board with calling it the Democrat Party, but they don’t do anything about it if a MAGA calls it that on their airwaves, either.

        Dems just need to consistently call them MAGA, and NEVER use the word Republican.

  • 5in1K@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    There were a couple republicans on harleys driving past repeatedly that I made fun of and called pussies.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      We had a guy with a big truck driving up and down blasting “Proud to be an American” from a large speaker in the bed of his truck. It was awesome when all the protesters cheered to hearing the song and applauded the guy.

      Pretty sure that wasn’t the reaction he expected.