NomNom@feddit.ukBanned to Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 months agoWhy drug approval in Canada should not rely on foreign regulatorstheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down10
arrow-up152arrow-down1external-linkWhy drug approval in Canada should not rely on foreign regulatorstheconversation.comNomNom@feddit.ukBanned to Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 months agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareStinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoBecause it was cheaper to rubber stamp based on US rubber stamping.
minus-squareMadMadBunny@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoCheaper on paper, they were an utter pain in the ass sometimes.
minus-squaremelsaskca@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoI’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide. Maybe not too surprised I guess…money talks.
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago I’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide They are careful to not approve dangerous drugs, but they are approving drugs that don’t work.
Because it was cheaper to rubber stamp based on US rubber stamping.
Cheaper on paper, they were an utter pain in the ass sometimes.
I’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide. Maybe not too surprised I guess…money talks.
They are careful to not approve dangerous drugs, but they are approving drugs that don’t work.