- cross-posted to:
- arc_raiders@jlai.lu
- cross-posted to:
- arc_raiders@jlai.lu
You must log in or # to comment.
To me this just feels like the next step of ‘shipping a game before it’s finished’.
I don’t understand how having situational voicelines, with transparency and the voice actors’ affirmative consent, would make the game “unfinished”.
I don’t like that they used them in the first place, but I’m glad to see this move. They certainly have the money.
Damage is done from my perspective. I won’t buy a game where they think they can use AI in place of people. Or that they can “fix it in post.”
From what I know they Paid the Voice Actors to make lines with ai Which is fine imho
They don’t seem to have gone about it in a bad way, but it still further opens the door to more icky practices.
So doing better than actual assholes opens the door to more icky practices?
No-one else, or at least as high profile, was doing AI voicework in their games. Embark were essentially the first with The Finals.
One successful game/studio doing it opens the door for other studios to start doing it.I get your Point but I honestly think its fine if VAs were paid
In a vacuum, in this instance, I’m mostly inclined to agree.
It normalising the practice is what I dislike.Doing pure ai voicework yea sure but paying them to do ts is still much better than just straight replacing them and i honestly dont see much difference to the female tiktok tts voice that was on every other video
You don’t buy a lot of games judging by the latter part of that statement.
That’s a weird assumption.
Finally, a move in the right direction. But I wonder how long it lasts…
I will buy it if they are all replaced.
I wonder if they’re gonna do the same for The Finals as well
