• applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I mean that was kind of a false choice forced onto the story by the writers. They could have done a transporter cloning and split one while keeping the other. You could argue the ethics of transporter cloning, which sadly none of the series ever really address in depth, but it’s been proven to be possible with Riker. One could argue that it was a unique circumstance which couldn’t be replicated but that’s lazy writer handwaving to get around the whole show becoming about transporter clones. Just another of the many things introduced in one episode then forgotten about forever which should have changed the entire trek universe and could be the basis of an entire series by itself.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Riker was a freak accident caused by a storm, they couldn’t reliably create transporter duplicates or they would have

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        Apparently it was a common enough thing that Rutherford won a bet when it happened to Boimler.

        • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          While lower decks is official I don’t think it’s canon (I have not seen it though) and it happens after voyager.

            • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Having never seen the show, I don’t know how to feel about that.

              I think it cheapens a few plotlines to make transporter dupes frequent when it is unheard of in the other shows

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                I mean, I was overstating my case a little bit. To be fair, Riker and Boimler are the only actual examples we have of it (at least by that particular method), and Rutherford’s bet was more about that sort of wacky situation being “a Boimler kind of thing to happen” (possibly paraphrased).