• Tomassci@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Since this is the Pragmatic Leftist Theory, I will say this:

    Mamdani is not really enough, sure, he’s doing a lot, but I don’t think he can carry the movement alone. But that’s fine. What the Left desperately needs is to regain trust lost after the decades of being run by authoritarians that didn’t give two shits about workers. The Left needs someone who can attract and unite different people. We need a surplus of left-Liberals that can be radicalized. And I don’t think Mamdani is doing a bad job in that.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah, Mamdani isn’t a savior, but he’s an extremely positive figure for the left’s PR in the USA, and a sign of hope for the younger generation’s views, the same way that Bernie’s surge of support in 2016 was after decades of ‘socialism’ being a poison word in US politics.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Authoritarian and control by wealth, whether it be corporate or billionaire.

      The money propping up the authoritarians is the issue.

  • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes but what about his goal of implementing Shakira Law in NY???

    What will you do if it’s illegal for hips to lie?

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      i personally think that social housing and public transport are more important than a city-run grocery store because especially housing is something that lots of people pay painful amounts of money to, but city-run grocery stores are certainly an interesting concept that could help people to lower their cost of living. which i think is better than giving the money to billionaires.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Are you genuinely stupid or merely pretending to be stupid so you can argue with people in bad faith?

      Be specific; cite sources.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Because profit-motivated grocery stores can’t afford to service these areas, but people still need to be able to eat.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thing that raises red-flags for me is that it’s going to be a contracted model, instead of being run directly by the city.

        I don’t live in the USA, I’m just tired of outsourced government.

        Overall, still seems positive though, just nitpicking.

        • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The only two nations in the entire world that voted in the UN against a resolution to recognise food as a human right were… the USA and Isreal.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Don’t be dense. Food is already subsidized in multiple ways, but those subsidies go into corporate profit margins. This store offers the benefits of subsidy to the common person.

          • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            47
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Don’t be dense yourself. I‘m just asking a question.

            I would like to know more about these groceries store plans. Apparently you don’t know anything specific.

            • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I‘m just asking a question.

              I would like to know more about these groceries store plans.

              Then why are you asking Lemmy instead of a search engine? Or just reading the mayor’s platform?

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              37
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Don’t change the subject. You didn’t ask for details. You said “so subsidized food?”, which is pointing out the obvious. Seems like you’re here to continue arguing instead of just googling the answer, so I’ll fetch the info for you and anyone else who might be curious:

              Mayor Zohran Mamdani said during a press conference on Tuesday that New York City’s planned city-run grocery stores would not be traditional municipally staffed supermarkets. Instead, the city would own the land, cover major overhead costs and bring in a private operator to sell staple foods at discounted prices, starting with a Manhattan site near La Marqueta in East Harlem.

              “The city will subsidize a core set of staples,” he said. “A private operator will run the store, but they answer to the standards that the city will set.” Those standards, he said, would mean lower prices on basics like bread and eggs.

              Source: AMNY.com.

            • Smaile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              only one you responded to was someone reacting negatively, yah your not good at hiding your bad faith.

              • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                if they hadn’t asked the question, we wouldn’t have this discussion and i wouldn’t have bothered to even learn something about this topic. so i learned about the project in more detail than if it had only been mentioned in a headline and i forgot to search for it myself.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Non-profit food. Huge difference.

          And if the city owns the land, there will also be significant cost savings long-term in rent and property tax.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Imagine how much ‘profits’ is absorbed by shareholders that could’ve went back to the public.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              16 hours ago

              If you’re thinking that means government run grocery stores are unrealistic keep in mind that they already exist for the military. They’re called commissaries and they sell groceries for significantly cheaper prices than private grocery stores, but they are open only to service-members and their families. We are perfectly capable of providing robust social services, but the state wants to keep it exclusive so they have an incentive for people living in poverty to join the military.

              • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 hours ago

                It mostly means government run doesn’t necessarily mean cheaper.

                Grocery chains have huge economies of scale and sophisticated automated management of stocks, ordering, deliveries driving costs down.

                A handful of government shops will likely have more overhead costs and inefficiencies than for example ALDI.

                I’m not against government run shops or serving underserved communities at all. However the government doing it doesn’t mean it’s cheaper overall.

                Also keep mind that some of the underserved areas have high crime rates, which is one reason for commercial business to stay away. A government run grocery store would likely need to also pay for extra security measures or guards.

                US military commissaries are also cheaper because there‘s no sales tax. Of course the scale also help. Do you know if military commissaries operate at a loss or break even?

                • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  This video by More Perfect Union talks about them at length. If I remember right, it is literally required by law to be cheaper overall (25% savings across the board) with a default pricing of cost plus 1% and a variable pricing model where common staples like eggs and milk are sold at a loss and it’s made up for on more niche items. They’re tax-subsidized through the military, and it’s an incredibly tiny portion of the budget. Some locations operate at a loss but they’re not allowed to close any stores so that’s why they need the subsidies.

                  So in short, yes, government run shops are cheaper because they’re tax-subsidized, and are not required to profit or even break even. Personally I don’t see any problem with government operating grocery stores at a loss to provide the working class with affordable groceries and having the rich foot the bill. In fact, I’d say that’s the whole point.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          18 hours ago

          If that’s what you want to call “ensuring working class people have access to food”, then yeah, sure, subsidized food.

  • Yliaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    83
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Wasn’t Mamdani the one condemning his wife for her open support for Palestine?

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      ‘isn’t Yliaster only here because he got banned from reddit for being too annoying??’

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Sounds like misinformation spread to fight the only politician in america actually doing shit for its constituency

      • Tomassci@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Reminds me of the Kat situation. Was getting flanked by Democrats, but also the most anti-Democrat Tankies because of not supporting Hamas (despite being Palestinian). I do think it’s our imperative to realize that no matter whether the Tankie movement is CIA-bankrolled or not, we need to leave it behind, as it only hurts us all with no benefit to us (really, the only benefit is to their accounts social media numbers), and start doing a proper peristalsis towards the Left, not a policy of rejecting the politicians closest to us.

        • Gonzako@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Well, quicker ones so far are the rent freezes and the 100k potholes fixed because he’s offering proper compensation for work. Next up are the city owned supermarkets and the tax on >5 mil 2nd houses on NY.

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          19 hours ago

          He is actually opening up a city run grocery store and putting all the pieces together right now. Takes a bit more time than fixing potholes to organize, but it is happening.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Besides the other answer that has more substance. He shoveled snow after a snow storm. It was after he got elected so it wasn’t only for PR. He was legit helping at the basic level. Showing people that is a good way to lead. The small things add up.