The American worker is on a productivity tear and it may have more to do with a surge in working from home than the effects of AI, according to a Stanford economist.
For the past five years, the output for non-farm businesses has increased by a sizable 2% per year, The Economist reported citing statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is a marked increase from the 1% productivity growth per year that defined most of the 2010s, and a trend that has taken even Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell by surprise.
Yet, while the hype around AI over the past several years makes it a logical candidate for the main driver behind the productivity boom, Nicholas Bloom, a Stanford economics professor who is known for explaining the Great Resignation of the early 2020s, says it’s more likely work-from-home policies since the pandemic are fueling the trend.
I generally prefer to work in the office as I like my work space and living space to be separate. I also have a short commute (by design) of less than 10 minutes walking.
I imagine moving an existing team from in office to remote would be best case scenario. You get all the existing social relationships and just move them on line.
I’m would be interested to see how those compare to completely remote teams.
There were actually a lot of these in startup type companies before covid hit.
The best ones were the ones that treated whatever comm app they used like an open discord channel and not virtualized meetings lol.
The former generates the same social relationships as an office because its your typical meme/gossip/rant/catchup/work talk you would otherwise have with your coworkers.
But if it’s the latter, every interaction is treated like a meeting which very quickly removes that type of communication, which is defnitley unhealthy for both you and the company at large since everyone gets treated as homogenous.