• edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    10 months ago

    The prequels were about liberalism’s decay into fascism. The OT was about revolutionary resistance to fascism.

    Then Disney bought it and wrote them as trying to reinstate liberalism only for it to decay into fascism again, so the sequels were about fighting fascism again in order to reinstate liberalism again.

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 months ago

      By the time of 9 they are not even talking about restoring liberalism or the pretense of democracy again. It is just the rebellion. The rebels become totally apolitical, thus Abrams keeps the franchise in an eternal state of rebels vs empire like he is a kid playing with toys reenacting the OT over and over again

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        thus Abrams keeps the franchise in an eternal state of rebels vs empire like he is a kid playing with toys reenacting the OT over and over again

        He’s the worst kind of uncreative brat in the neighborhood, the kind that bashes the toys together until they break (killing off characters and undoing any changes that they had established) and scratches his name on stuff that was never his (like the not-Tatooine “Jakuu” and the not-Corsucant “Hosnian Prime” that was almost Coruscant until the suits said he can’t quite break that toy, and the not-Empire “First Order” and the not-Rebellion “Resistance” and don’t get me started on the not-Sith “Knights of Ren.”).