The lack of a U.S. carrier in the Pacific may be short-lived if the Navy deploys another in the next couple of months. But it shows how the open-ended operations with Iran are running some American sailors ragged, analysts say, while the Trump administration further retreats from the Asia-Pacific region and focuses on the Western Hemisphere.

“The administration says that the Pacific is supposed to be the most important behind the Western Hemisphere,” said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Instead, the U.S. is “doing the exact opposite” of its previously expressed goal of pulling out of the Middle East.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    we can’t discount the possibility of Xi being as stupid as Trump and Putin.

    I’m trying to think of a comparable series of blunders the Chinese have committed.

    Xi’s much more in the mold of an Obama or a Merkle than Putin or Trump

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The three-week incursion into Vietnam in 1979 was certainly a bad decision by the Chinese government. Idk if it stacks up against the American 13 year invasion, occupation, terror-bombing, and torture/assassination campaign that became emblematic of US Foreign policy. Easy to forget the scope of the difference between the two interventions, given how often modern China-watchers love to bring up the former while neglecting the latter.

        But do you have anything perpetrated by the Xi administration specifically? Or just something a sitting administrative official actually presided over?

        • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean sure, but I don’t see China behaving much better if they ever become a super-power the way the US was for the last hundred years. Especially considering their treatment of Uyghurs.

          I would argue a large part of China not trying to militarily expand their Power was US dominance and their global policing.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t see China behaving much better if they ever become a super-power

            I’m not sure what else they’d need to do to qualify, shy of actually building out a global network of military bases. In that case, sure. If they start acting like the US, then they’re no better than the US.

            But for the time being, what I’m seeing - and I’ll quote Dr Lubinda Haabazoka, Director of the University of Zambia Graduate School of Business and former President of the Economics Association of Zambia on this one

            Every time China visits we get a hospital, every time Britain visits we get a lecture.

            To date, I’ve seen a lot of Chinese Hospitals (and factories and ports and colleges) opening up across the world. Meanwhile, the only thing guys like Trump and Starmer seem to want to contribute are frowns, finger wags, and 500 lb bunker busters onto wedding parties.

            • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I’m not sure what else they’d need to do to qualify, shy of actually building out a global network of military bases. In that case, sure. If they start acting like the US, then they’re no better than the US.

              Yes, and what I’m saying is that the only reason they haven’t done that yet is because the US hasn’t let them. But I suppose that is something we can only speculate about until the time comes. And again, I think we only need to look at how they are treating Uyghurs and their aggressive/imperialistic local geopolitics to be able to guess how they would act if they were in the position the US is/was. And that’s not touching on their surveillance state which is unrivalled in the world.

              To date, I’ve seen a lot of Chinese Hospitals (and factories and ports and colleges) opening up across the world. Meanwhile, the only thing guys like Trump and Starmer seem to want to contribute are frowns, finger wags, and 500 lb bunker busters onto wedding parties.

              That’s the same type of Neo-colonialism the French have been up to for the last 100 years. Definitely not something positive for these African countries. There’s a reason it’s called debt trap diplomacy.

              I just don’t see why we should hope for the benevolence of the upcoming authoritarian super-power when there’s ample evidence they are no better and just haven’t had the freedom to be as bad scope-wise as the current super-power.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You need to cut back on all the tankie propganda you’re consuming a little bit, buddy.