• datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      No, they want to provoke and probe. Responding would give them information. Why do that? In this case, what was seriously endangered other than pride? Just shrug it off and not give the wannabe-second-greatest-army-in-the-world the satisfaction.

      • metermatic26@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Well, because it sets a precedent. The Russians have once again escalated and will now continue doing this untill they risk either political humilation or the loss of assets. Right now, they risk neither.

        We, on the other hand, are put at risk by not responding. The Danes will now risk their crews and helicopters by flying them near Russia vessels and the only way to eleviate that risk is either by deterring the Russians or just not flying at all and letting them do what they want.

        By choosing neither, we are actually increasing the risk that things will escalate further as, sooner or later, the Russians will simply screw up and accidentally down a helicopter.

      • metermatic26@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Right…who said anything about shooting them? We had the Russians harrassing NATO vessels in the Baltic Sea for decades. I’m sure we can come up with our own creative ways of pestering the Russians, short of just shooting them.

        • borkborkbork@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          you did, bozo.

          maybe respond with a show of force?

          what, were you going to go india-vs-china and land a team on the boat with sticks to beat them?

          goddamn what the fuck