Wisconsin’s exemption for small farms is one of many federal and state carve-outs that have historically left farm workers — and dairy workers in particular — with fewer rights and protections than others.

Wisconsin’s exemption for small farms is one of many federal and state carve-outs that have historically left farm workers — and dairy workers in particular — with fewer rights and protections than others.

For most workers in Wisconsin who get hurt on the job, the state’s workers’ compensation system is there to cover medical expenses and pay a portion of their wages while they heal.

“One of the bedrock principles of worker’s compensation is universal coverage,” the state’s Department of Workforce Development, which oversees the workers’ compensation system, says on its website. “That means that virtually every employee is covered.”

But the law is different for farms, and many immigrant dairy workers — the backbone of one of the state’s most celebrated yet dangerous industries — don’t get this protection. Wisconsin exempts all kinds of farms with fewer than six employees not related to the owners from the requirement to have workers’ compensation coverage.

No state or federal agency appears to track how many of Wisconsin’s 5,700 or so dairy farms fall into that category — or how many workers go without coverage. Neither does the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, one of the state’s most powerful lobbying groups.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    13·
    6 months ago

    Now you know why dairy farmers oppose any immigration reform, even if it becomes difficult for them to find good and reliable labor force

  • Kepabar
    5·
    6 months ago

    One of the reasons I’m against the current immigration policy of the US is it creates this under caste of people who can be exploited heavily by certain industries.

    While in this example technically all citizens lack the same protections, the carve out in these laws always just happens to align with whatever industries rely heavily on migrant workers.

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.worldEnglish
    315·
    6 months ago

    If you’re working for a place illegally why should you be guaranteed the benefits of those that work there legally?

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.worldEnglish
        28·
        6 months ago

        Being a legal citizen has benefits otherwise there would be no point to the legal immigration process. You can’t just roll up to a country and be like “I live here now, I’m a citizen, I should get the same treatment as everyone else even though none of my money goes to fund public programs.”

        I’m not debating immigration or how long it takes, but it’s shitty to treat one illegal immigrant differently just because they could cross the border easily compared to someone who has to fly here and do it the legal (or less than legal) way, at the very least you need a passport to get into the country via a plane.

        Our country is already fucked when it comes to healthcare, we don’t need any other strains on it.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      7·
      6 months ago

      Wisconsin exempts all kinds of farms with fewer than six employees not related to the owners from the requirement to have workers’ compensation coverage.

      This has nothing to do with their immigration status of individuals, just acknowledging that farm work is frequently filled by immigrants. Whether they are US citizens, immigrants, or undocumented immigrants, if they work on a farm with fewer than six non-family employees then the farm owners are not required to have worker’s comp coverage.