• PizzaMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious to hear your perspective on that.

    Ramaswamy’s response to the pansexual women is about as out of touch as one can get. Him saying that the LGBTQ+ is a bunch of groups is just a thinly veiled effort to weaken the power of the LGBTQ+ through propoganda. He wants to act like republicans are the victims when the LGBTQ+ receive death threats and attacks on a routine basis. He also just straight up doesn’t understand much about the LGBTQ+. Basically the whole thing he uses nonstop strawman fallacies. He has a fundamental lack of understanding of everything he criticized through the whole thing. And in the end it’s culture war bullshit.

    If you’re aware of a more appropriate word, I’m all ears.

    “The decline of christianity”

    Every time I look to Christ for guidance

    Even if we have free will that isn’t an instance of you changing your mind of your own free will. These things you list are just examples of you performing actions that are in line with your beliefs.

    The foundation of Western civilization is not, and cannot, be infested with termites, because the foundation of Western civilization is the Lord our God.

    I disagree that the foundation of western civ is solely placed on god. There are a lot more things that go into it than that:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Western_civilization

    If you’re going to look through this, I recommend spending extra time on the section explaining the enlightenment.

    There’s nothing you can say to legitimately criticize God.

    Sure I can, god, according to your worldview, created a world in which children get cancer. I can conceptualize a world in which that does not happen, and therefore a failure of god. And before you say I think I know better than god, in reality I know better than the humans who made god up.

    If we don’t know how something works, of course we can ascribe the answer to God, and that answer is always correct.

    That’s a terrible thing to do because it is a form of lying to yourself. In the end it wasn’t Zeus who causes lightning, it is a build up of a difference in energy between clouds and the ground. Answering “god” in that context was wrong. We shouldn’t just blame a mystery on a bigger mystery.

    It’s created by God to work in a certain way, and we’ve deduced the mechanism by which it happens.

    No part of the explanation for how lightning works involves god.

    But it misses the vast all-encompassing nature of God’s glory, so it doesn’t seem like a very compelling answer.

    People prefer real answers rather than ones that just blame a bigger mystery.

    The most intelligent scientists all believe in God.

    Not only is that not true (because you added the “most intelligent” qualifier), but given that scientific literacy is correlated with atheism, I find it to be rather damning for religion:

    https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2009/11/Scientists-and-Belief-1.gif

    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

    If god really is the answer for everything all around us we would expect those who understand the universe better than the average population to understand god better than the average population. Yet we see the opposite.

    Einstein is the most notable example.

    He was a really weird deist, not a christian. And he was from a time when it was far less socially acceptable to be an atheist. So that’s not really much of an argument.

    I would now if I picked it back up.

    Go for it! It’s pretty easy to play against others nowadays now that there are so many popular chess sites. chess.com and lichess are pretty decent.

    • 10A@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ramaswamy’s response to the pansexual women is about as out of touch as one can get.

      I wasn’t referring to that in particular. I was referring to the big-picture point he made in the whole last 11 minutes of the video. The point was about western civilization, the insidious project to undermine it, and our duty to defend it. That point is foundational to much of our disagreement. It sounds like you stopped watching before he even got to the point.

      “The decline of christianity”

      Yeah, but that misses the bigger picture. It’s not as if people are rejecting Christ and converting to Judaism. Rather it’s a secular movement driven by Satan’s success at convincing a vast swath of the populace that God is imaginary.

      I disagree that the foundation of western civ is solely placed on god.

      This is one of those ways in which Wikipedia tends to be secular. It says in the intro that Western civilization is “linked” to Christiandom. That’s misleading. Western civilization is Christiandom. The only difference is we don’t call it that anymore. But everything that followed from Christiandom is built upon Christiandom as an extension of Christiandom. Though to the article’s credit, it does later state that:

      […] Western civilization, which throughout most of its history, has been nearly equivalent to Christian culture.

      That’s close to accurate. In truth the two are inseparably identical, which is why Satan hates Western civilization, that that in turn is why you’ve been convinced to believe you want to contribute to the project of undermining Western civilization.

      If you’re going to look through this, I recommend spending extra time on the section explaining the enlightenment.

      I’m not sure exactly what points you’re referring to here. Skimming through it, I’m pretty sure I already know all of these details. The only change I’d make is to emphasize God’s role in all of these things, and His importance to all of these historical figures.

      Sure I can, god, according to your worldview, created a world in which children get cancer.

      It is the height of hubris to criticize God. His wisdom is infinite, and if yours was too then you’d understand why certain children are given cancer. It’s not for us to try to understand. It’s for us to accept in our worship and prayer.

      And before you say I think I know better than god, in reality I know better than the humans who made god up.

      At some point, immanently I hope, you’ll realize how absurdly wrong you are about this. You have demons whispering lies into your ears, and you believe them unquestioningly. I know they make it feel good when you believe them, but they’re lying to you.

      In the end it wasn’t Zeus who causes lightning, it is a build up of a difference in energy between clouds and the ground.

      Comparing Zeus to God is far worse than apples and oranges, because at least apples and oranges are both fruits. It’s like comparing icebergs to smartphones. They have absolutely nothing whatsoever in common, to the point that it’s nonsensical to even try to compare them.

      Let’s say you were to throw a basketball, and make a basket. Some scientists observe it, and say “That’s interesting. Let’s figure out what that’s all about.” So they observe you throwing the basketball. They measure your movements, the wind movements, the ball’s PSI, the height of the basket, the material compositions of the ball and basket, just all of it. And then they formulate a theory which postulates how the ball goes through the basket. And then people start to deny that you exist because they have the theory of how the basketball goes through the basket. The whole idea is absolutely ridiculous. God is in control, no matter what your demons tell you.

      Not only is that not true [that the most intelligent scientists all believe in God] (because you added the “most intelligent” qualifier), but given that scientific literacy is correlated with atheism, I find it to be rather damning for religion:

      First off, it’s self-evidently true, as anyone who denies God cannot be said to be very intelligent. I’m trying to word that so as not to offend you, and it’s hard. Sorry. My point here is not to insult you, but just to explain my statement about the most intelligent scientists.

      Secondly, the scientific disciplines are certainly attractive to atheists who want to devote their lives to pretending that they’re disproving God by collecting the evidence of the basketball. So yes, atheists are more likely to become scientists than pastors. We don’t need to consult any studies to know that’s true.

      Go for it! It’s pretty easy to play against others nowadays now that there are so many popular chess sites. chess.com and lichess are pretty decent.

      Maybe eventually, but not today. I have too much else on my plate. But thank you for letting me know it’s easy to play online. That’s something I hadn’t considered.

      • PizzaMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was referring to the big-picture point he made in the whole last 11 minutes of the video.

        I am aware that isn’t the focus that you had in mind, but it was one of the bigger reactions I had to it. My overall view is that he is deeply out of touch and incapable of using anything other than a strawman argument. He fundamentally does not understand what he is criticizing.

        It’s not as if people are rejecting Christ and converting to Judaism.

        That’s not what “The decline in chrstianity” describes.

        Rather it’s a secular movement driven by Satan’s success at convincing a vast swath of the populace that God is imaginary.

        That’s just not happening.

        Western civilization is Christiandom.

        No it’s not. Western civ is a pretty arbitrary phrase that is used in a million different ways, and christianity is only a subset of that. Words and phrases change over time, and this is one of those things that has changed.

        the project of undermining Western civilization.

        There is no such project, at least how I define western civilization.

        I’m not sure exactly what points you’re referring to here. Skimming through it, I’m pretty sure I already know all of these details.

        If you’re aware of all the details then you should also be aware that the enlightment (a huge part of western civilization) was the birth of science, the scientific method, and secularism. Meaning christendom != western civ.

        It is the height of hubris to criticize God. His wisdom is infinite

        I am criticizing a fictional, human made character. As a result of being human made, there is no such infinite wisdom.

        if yours was too then you’d understand why certain children are given cancer.

        There is no good reason.

        It’s not for us to try to understand. It’s for us to accept in our worship and prayer.

        How have you determined that you aren’t worshiping an evil god if you haven’t questioned god? How do you know that it isn’t the case that both god and satan are evil?

        You have demons whispering lies into your ears, and you believe them unquestioningly.

        Nobody is whispering anything in my ears, metephorically or literally, whichever way you mean. And I question everything before I believe it.

        Comparing Zeus to God is far worse than apples and oranges, because at least apples and oranges are both fruits. It’s like comparing icebergs to smartphones. They have absolutely nothing whatsoever in common, to the point that it’s nonsensical to even try to compare them.

        Both Yahweh and Zeus are fictional characters which people irrationally use to explain why things work. That was the basis for my comparison and therefore makes it a valid comparison.

        And then people start to deny that you exist because they have the theory of how the basketball goes through the basket. The whole idea is absolutely ridiculous.

        That’s not really how that works.

        it’s self-evidently true, as anyone who denies God cannot be said to be very intelligent.

        That’s not true.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religiosity_and_intelligence

        scientific disciplines are certainly attractive to atheists who want to devote their lives to pretending that they’re disproving God by collecting the evidence of the basketball.

        That is absolutely not why people do science. They do so because they want to learn more about the universe, do some good for humanity and advance it. Do you even know a single scientist?

        • 10A@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am criticizing a fictional, human made character. As a result of being human made, there is no such infinite wisdom.

          Imagine for once that you are completely wrong about this belief of yours. Yes, it’s the height of hubris. If we know nothing else, we know at very least that our Creator lives.

          How have you determined that you aren’t worshiping an evil god if you haven’t questioned god? How do you know that it isn’t the case that both god and satan are evil?

          Psalm 100:5:

          For the Lord is good; his mercy is everlasting; and his truth endureth to all generations.

          To choose just one of many possible answers.

          Nobody is whispering anything in my ears, metephorically or literally, whichever way you mean. And I question everything before I believe it.

          I mean literally. You may look at your shoulder, expecting to see no demon, while maybe picturing the cutesy BSD mascot, and sure enough you don’t see one sitting on your shoulder. “See?” you reassure yourself, “no demon.” You then recall that you’ve never seen the BSD mascot running around anywhere IRL, and conclude that demons must not exist.

          How sure are you that you do a good job questioning everything before you believe it? Is it possible that you’ve made an error?

          Demons do not look like cutesy cartoon characters, and indeed they’re not visible to the human eye (at least not to mine). As with all extant spiritual entities, we can know they exist despite our inability to see them.

          Are you just as quick to deny that dark matter exists?

          That’s not true. [Re: “it’s self-evidently true, as anyone who denies God cannot be said to be very intelligent.”]

          You said you were willing to question your beliefs, so I urge you to question this. I think it underlies the rift between us.

          You want to see yourself as a reasonably intelligent person, and you want to cling to a state of mind which you believe to be shared by other intelligent people.

          But I ask you, are you so sure that it’s intelligent to reject God? Consider the following:

          According to Pew, actively religious people tend to be far happier. Is it intelligent to want to be happy? Could this effect possibly be a quantitative measurement of God’s blessings? And is it intelligent to want to be happy?

          Again, I ask you: is it intelligent to want to be happy?

          • PizzaMan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            To choose just one of many possible answers.

            So you just don’t question whether or not god is good or evil, have I understood correctly? If so, then you have no method of determining if you are worshiping an evil being. That should immediately alarm you if you have any goodness in you.

            I mean literally.

            Like I said earlier, whichever way you mean, nobody is whispering anything in my ears.

            How sure are you that you do a good job questioning everything before you believe it?

            It highly depends on the matter at hand. The ridiculousness of a claim is tied to how much I look into something before believing it. If my friend tells me they got a new dog, I’ll probably believe them simply because my trust in them is sufficient for an ubiquitous claim such as that. If they tell me they bought a ferrari, I’d be a little more inquisitive and ask for pictures. If they tell me they bought a dragon, nothing short of seeing it in person will convince me because my understanding of the world is such that dragons do not exist. For a claim as ridiculous as that I would need very strong evidence.

            Holding belief until you have sufficient evidence is what you do to avoid errors. I’m not perfect, there are certainly things I am wrong about. But to the best of my ability to understand, this is not something I am wrong about.

            Are you just as quick to deny that dark matter exists?

            We have pretty strong evidence to suggest that dark matter exists.

            Again, I ask you: is it intelligent to want to be happy?

            Sure, but lying to yourself will never make you happy. You’re asking me to lie to myself.

            • 10A@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you just don’t question whether or not god is good or evil, have I understood correctly?

              Nobody has the rightful authority to question the word of God. I quoted a verse from the Bible to you. We accept God’s word without question because we are His humble servants. It would be arrogant to suppose we have permission to question His word, and it would be evil for us to desire to question His word. When you are presented with a Bible quote, you accept it as true and holy. When a demon tells you to question it, or claims that it’s false, you repent and ask Jesus to shield you from this demonic temptation. In the end, we must always conclude that the word of God is correct.

              Like I said earlier, whichever way you mean, nobody is whispering anything in my ears.

              And yet you continue to demonstrate clear evidence to the contrary. If you’re not plagued by demons then show me your embrace of God.

              But to the best of my ability to understand, this is not something I am wrong about.

              You put understanding before faith. That’s backwards. I assure you, this is something you are wrong about.

              We have pretty strong evidence to suggest that dark matter exists.

              True, but we have a thousand times more evidence to confirm that God exists. Evidence to which you are blind.

              [Re: “Is it intelligent to want to be happy?”] Sure, but lying to yourself will never make you happy. You’re asking me to lie to myself.

              If (A) I was asking you to lie to yourself, and (B) lying to yourself will never make you happy, then © actively religious people cannot be happier than irreligious people.

              This is basic logic: AB ∴ C

              And yet © is demonstrably false, an assertion which I substantiated with hard data. And that was just one survey. Survey after survey repeatedly demonstrates that actively religious people are far happier.

              I’ll reply to some of the various other things you wrote, but this is the heart of our discussion. The crux, if you will. Your perspective is that you’re too smart to believe in God, and you refuse to acknowledge that God blesses His faithful believers with happiness. You believe that intelligent people choose unhappiness despite the obvious fact that it would be rather unwise to intentionally choose unhappiness, by virtue of the very definition of happiness. The only possible explanation for your insistent rejection of God is your unknowing loyalty to Satan, who has successfully convinced you that not even he exists.

              • PizzaMan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                We accept God’s word without question because we are His humble servants.

                Then like I said earlier, you have no method to determine what you worship is a good being. That should terrify you if you are a good person and immediately make you second guess everything.

                And yet you continue to demonstrate clear evidence to the contrary. If you’re not plagued by demons then show me your embrace of God.

                This is a false dichotomy.

                You put understanding before faith. That’s backwards. I assure you, this is something you are wrong about.

                Nope, it’s the correct way around.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

                True, but we have a thousand times more evidence to confirm that God exists.

                If you think you have evidence that I haven’t seen before I am all ears.

                If (A) I was asking you to lie to yourself, and (B) lying to yourself will never make you happy, then © actively religious people cannot be happier than irreligious people.

                This argument is based on the false premise that religious people would see their religion as a lie. I’m an atheist, so if I were to embrace christianity I would see it as a lie.

                Your perspective is that you’re too smart to believe in God

                Nope. I have no evidence for it, so I do not believe it. It has nothing to do with my intelligence.

                You believe that intelligent people choose unhappiness despite the obvious fact that it would be rather unwise to intentionally choose unhappiness

                Once again, belief is not a choice.

                And correlation does not imply causation, therefore you cannot rationally say that being religious makes you more happy.

                The only possible explanation for your insistent rejection of God is your unknowing loyalty to Satan

                No, the actual explanation is my responses above. And this is also a fallacy:

                https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Holmesian_fallacy

                • 10A@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Then like I said earlier, you have no method to determine what you worship is a good being.

                  I quoted the true word of God — the holy Bible. When you parrot your demons who claim it’s false, you reveal your foolish allegiance, but still you must know deep in your heart that God is good.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

                  I’m not trying to prove anything here. If you think I am, I have to wonder what led you to think that.

                  My primary goal here should be readily obvious: Matthew 28:19–20, the Great Commission. I am planting a seed, and praying your soil is fertile.

                  Your primary goal here, by contrast, is laid out in Romans 1:18-32. I pray your disposition is temporary and reversible.

                  If you think you have evidence that I haven’t seen before I am all ears.

                  You’re fully immersed in it. But until you establish a penitent relationship with God, you are blind.

                  Nope. I have no evidence for it, so I do not believe it. It has nothing to do with my intelligence.

                  If you’re honestly not trying to prove how clever you are, then submit to God in faith, and the copious evidence can then be revealed to you.

                  Once again, belief is not a choice.

                  No matter how much you insist upon that, I repeatedly choose to believe in the Lord our God. I accept that you don’t yet understand how belief can be a choice, but it most certainly is.

                  And correlation does not imply causation, therefore you cannot rationally say that being religious makes you more happy.

                  I have zero doubt that the cause of happiness is God’s blessing. Joy is quintessentially Christian.

                  • PizzaMan@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I quoted the true word of God — the holy Bible.

                    That’s a circular argument. If the devil had a holy book you’d see the same thing about how the devil is the good guy.

                    I’m not trying to prove anything here. If you think I am, I have to wonder what led you to think that.

                    I do not think that. I linked it because it is the golden standard for belief, and it requires evidence before belief.

                    I am planting a seed, and praying your soil is fertile.

                    I’ve been having these sorts of conversations with christians for over a decade. If christians had anything convincing to say, I think I would have heard it by now.

                    Your primary goal here, by contrast, is laid out in Romans 1:18-32.

                    it’s not. I’m honestly just talking with you for the sake of enjoyment at this point.

                    You’re fully immersed in it. But until you establish a penitent relationship with God, you are blind.

                    The “look at the trees” argument is an invalid one.

                    If you’re honestly not trying to prove how clever you are, then submit to God in faith, and the copious evidence can then be revealed to you.

                    Nope, evidence must come before belief, and belief is not a direct choice.