• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It mostly seems like a flex to me, if they can build this then it shows how advanced technologically China has become. This is the tech that US hyped up, but was never actually able to make it work. China putting this into practice would be a clear sign that China outpaced US technologically.

      • relay@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        while that would be funny, I suspect resources would best be spent on something else.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think this would make sense on certain routes, like Beijing-Shanghai, where demand is so consistently high that someone will pay a premium for getting there quicker. Probably not practical for all current HSR routes.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think these kinds of projects are really important to have because they’re motivating. They show that real technological progress is being made and create optimism for the future. On a practical level, there’s always a lot of new tech that falls out of this sort of stuff that’s generally useful. For example, a lot of tech that was developed during the Apollo program ended up being used lots of different ways to improve lives of the people.

          • relay@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Building more technology that operates in a vaccum and use it often will create a practical space where people will discover interesting perspectives that are useful for space travel.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              China is planning a moon base, so potentially using hyperloop on the moon to connect different bases could make a lot of sense.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      China already has high saturation of regular high speed rail, and I’m guessing this would supplement that potential for long distance travel. It mostly seems like flex to me, if they can build this then it shows how advanced technologically China has become. This is the tech that US hyped up, but was never actually able to make it work. China putting this into practice would be a clear sign that China outpaced US technologically.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          China first put a maglev train into service in Shanghai in 2002. It’s just now planning to roll out inter city maglev services in the next couple of years. Call that a 25 year gap from first trial run to broad implementation.

          So if they can put a Hyperloop into short limited service by 2030, you’re still looking at 2055 for broad implementation.

          I guess the point is that you can’t get to the far future without first going through the near future. Difference is that Chinese planners and leaders will look at a transport plan that has goals out to 2055 and take it seriously. Western leaders only care about plans they can implelent this election cycle.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I can’t imagine this stuff will see operation in the near future, but there’s so much that you learn from even just trying to build something like this that will be applicable in a lot of other areas. Big ambitious projects are traditionally really good for pushing the technological envelope.

  • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’d personally opt for something more “conventional”, like the SCMaglev being developed in Japan (or better yet, that Chengdu Maglev prototype). As fast as this train would go inside a vacuum tube, the tube itself will just add much more complexities and points of failure, on top of being more expensive to build/maintain.

    Also a large part of the “experience” is also being to watch the scenery pass by at 300-600km/h+ out of the window, which is lost when inside of a very long concrete/steel tube.