We have little to no evidence that this was the case. Unfortunately, we do have evidence that the first nations were settled, agrarian societies before smallpox and company were introduced. That’s what De Soto describes encountering 100 years before the English document that the first nations peoples live as roving hunter gatherers. Because our written historical record was only able to record what amounts to a post-apocalyptic society, and the first nations kept little written records themselves, there’s so much about Native America that we just won’t ever be sure about.
I think it is only about the meme(?) and how the premise of the content is wrong and through that any discussion about the argument itself is pointless.
Your criticism is valid but it’s based on accepting the premise that they already rejected.
We have little to no evidence that this was the case. Unfortunately, we do have evidence that the first nations were settled, agrarian societies before smallpox and company were introduced. That’s what De Soto describes encountering 100 years before the English document that the first nations peoples live as roving hunter gatherers. Because our written historical record was only able to record what amounts to a post-apocalyptic society, and the first nations kept little written records themselves, there’s so much about Native America that we just won’t ever be sure about.
To be clear, I’m not saying that first nations peoples were proto-capitalists. Just what the conditions for being a capitalist are.
And even if they knew what words meant…
So?
They’d still have been genocided by capitalism (in this framework). Do they think it doesn’t count when you do it to your own ideology?
Most of the criticisms about capitalism are that it eats its own young!
I think it is only about the meme(?) and how the premise of the content is wrong and through that any discussion about the argument itself is pointless.
Your criticism is valid but it’s based on accepting the premise that they already rejected.