• Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cops and landlords are not all people, unless I’m misreading this thread, that was my point.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t do any of this, I only jumped in to point out the grammatical miscomprehension between y’all, I’m as neutral as Switzerland here.

            • Obi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ok I guess it’s hard to focus because you are agitated by this thread, totally understandable.

              You make a point about generalising “all people” (which was totally valid btw).

              Other commentators point out that cops and landlords aren’t “all people” (as in, there are people that exist that are neither cops or landlords), and they’re “only” generalising these sub-groups (again, not saying I agree with that either).

              Miscomprehension ensues.

                • Obi@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  No worries! I’m just proud we turned it around. The goalposts were indeed moved on a technicality here. There are certainly a ton of people around here that refuse any nuance on these two groups, I totally got your point and think it’s a fair one, I also don’t like blanket statements.