• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope, no Malthus, no tragedy of the commons. No eugenics or “policy”.

    Allow trends to go unaltered. That’s all.

    Do those other things actively. Energy, design, etc.

    Let population decline. We don’t need billions of humans. I’m not suggesting anyone goes without, or is curtailed. But nothing compares to the absence of a human. You can make every positively eco choice you can, but nothing will compare to you not existing at all.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s no way to passively “let” the population decline as long as the birth rate remains above 2 kids on average. People will simply have kids unless most nations adopt something like China’s 1 child policy, which I just don’t see happening. The population will objectively grow. Even if the birth rate is low in your country, you will get climate refugees from other nations. The population will increase in the imperial core as the region around the equator becomes more unlivable, and the response of the imperial core to those declining conditions is decidedly genocidal violence. Look at ICE. Look at the rafts full of climate refugees being deliberately sunk by fascist coast guards. The message is loud and clear: the imperial core wants to decrease the birth rate of “undesirables” (read: black and brown people from the third world) while maintaining their own standard of living, continuing to wage endless interventions, coups, embargoes, and sanctions, and continuing to exploit the lower cost of labor in “underdeveloped” (colonized) nations. Something’s got to give, and it’s not going to be the population. It’s going to be standard of living.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Population will not forever grow, this is already forecasted by established scientists.

        My point is that countries experiencing lower-than -replacement-birthrate should allow it, with the acknowledgement that climate refugees will come to fill their job positions. Over a longer period, birth rate should continue to be allowed to sink, as future humanity grapples with a post-climate-crisis world.

        A far flung generation can have new opinions, when they’ve survived our sins, mastered technology, and can make a new try

        To repeat: I don’t think any group should be “reduced” via external pressure. Only that groups could be allowed to contract naturally, without policy intervention to “boost” birthrate. Immigration should serve.

        • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Population will not forever grow, this is already forecasted by established scientists.

          wasn’t suggesting it will. Just suggesting that if the current birth rates are above 2, there’s no way to say that we could passively “let” the population decline if that’s not what it’s actually doing. Globally the population is still growing. It will either decline on its own, eventually, or someone will implement malthusian policies.