• 8 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle














  • I left Toronto because I couldn’t afford to buy a somewhat cheap condo or a reasonable house. My household income was $160k at the time. It’s a nice city with great services, great people, but the housing is unbelievable - it forced me and my family out with our two kids.

    I have also visited Copenhagen and it’s the same there - extremely high housing costs means that you’re poor by default unless you bought in 20-30 years ago. Great, I can buy a beer for 5 kroner, but housing is an apartment for $300k

    Calgary, Sydney, Auckland, Vancouver… yes, all of these also apply.







  • The article is bereft of details and, admittedly, I did not go to the anti-camp’s website etc. to learn more.

    How many jobs are going to be created? How much profit will be extracted from the land? Is there a tariff they’ll pay per tonne? What happens in the worst-case scenario wrt to ecological impact, and jobs? Is there a well-cleanup provision in place as well?

    Something tells me that this is actually a very risky 20+ year project where this very valuable resource (pure sand, right?) ends up profiting a the owners and we get very little in return and actually incur the most risk and worst rewards of the deal.

    I do agree with the council though. Their decision being overridden by an unelected board is undemocratic at best and at worst ignores the ecological impact that has not been considered by the land use board from what I can tell? Again, article lacks many details here as to how this undemocratic provincial board is now arriving at decisions that used to fall to local councils.

    Can we appeal the appeal with *another * 50 person delegation (I think those are the rules for this unelected board to hear a case) 😏