ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoCounterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study. In other words, well, science.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoBecause of the implication.
Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.
In other words, well, science.
Because of the implication.