• Hugucinogens
    link
    fedilink
    966 months ago

    So, I don’t trust them to have actually done what I’m going to describe, (and honestly I’ve just accepted that even with everything off, they’re still giving me ads based on stuff I’ve only talked about and never clicked or written anything), but:

    The programs that recognize specific phrases(Ok Google), are always separate from normal voice recognition (and much much lighter in terms of processing). So, if they weren’t Google, they might have left the “Ok Google” recognition on, but not process anything else that the mic receives.

    They’re probably still listening in though.

    • @BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      456 months ago

      Not necessarily you or your case, but I’m still convinced that a lot of people just have confirmation bias (only noticing it when it happens and discounting the thousands of otherwise innocent ads). There’s also subconscious ad effects, like you were only talking about it to begin with because your saw it somewhere because it’s been spreading by weird of mouth from people who initially saw an ad

        • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          It’s not just that either. Google knows who your family is. They know who lives with you because of location data. So any time those people search for anything regardless of whether they’re on your home network, they likely serve ads to whole families at a time when one person searches for something.

          • @trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            This has been my theory as well, Google presumably knows when I meet up with a friend for lunch (I don’t know if they go to such lengths but they certainly have access to the data to figure it out), if my friend then starts searching for something related to our conversation afterwards, Google could serve me ads about it too, just inferring the topic of our conversation based on that

      • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Doesn’t really explain why I was receiving cat litter ads after only speaking with my husband offhand about maybe getting a cat. We didn’t already have a cat, so hadn’t had any reason to look up any cat care goods ever, and I had never searched for anything even remotely cat-related up to that point. But wouldn’t you know it, about 45 minutes later, I was getting kitty litter ads. Very spooky.

        • @BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          Sorry but I want the true story to be that your husband immediately went off and started googling to find a cat to surprise you for Christmas thus you got cat ads (same network like someone else said).

          • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            36 months ago

            Lmao, I wish but no, no hallmark movie plots here. This was a few years ago, and we now have said cat :) He definitely forgot immediately after I mentioned it until I showed up with a cat one day lol

    • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      296 months ago

      That’s the gist of how it likely works; the wake word is detected by an “always on” audio DSP, but a software mode prevents the passing of microphone data back up to the SoC. I’m actually quite familiar with Amazon Echo engineering design, and they implement the “mute” feature in a manner that takes privacy seriously: the LED indicator on that button is hardwired to only turn on when the microphone is literally powered off. Thus, an Echo device can’t even manage such a cheeky response, nor can a software bug or hack enable listening while the mute button is lit.

    • Something Burger 🍔
      link
      fedilink
      176 months ago

      What you describe is actually how it works. If they actually sent all you say to their servers, it would be trivial to detect with a network analyser.

      • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        And if they were found to be sending it all the time, holy fuck the fines would end the company.

        • @EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Lol, what are you talking about? When was the last time the FTC ended a company over shady privacy practices?

          Amazon would get a fine that would amount to like 0.001% of one day’s profits.

    • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      146 months ago

      I will say that that’s exactly how the google voice api works. Of course it’s all in a black box, but that’s how the documentation describes it and how it functions when making a voice app

    • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      Why listen and risk even a slap on the wrist?

      Recall Target:

      As Pole’s computers crawled through the data, he was able to identify about 25 products that, when analyzed together, allowed him to assign each shopper a “pregnancy prediction” score. More important, he could also estimate her due date to within a small window, so Target could send coupons timed to very specific stages of her pregnancy.

      One Target employee I spoke to provided a hypothetical example. Take a fictional Target shopper named Jenny Ward, who is 23, lives in Atlanta and in March bought cocoa-butter lotion, a purse large enough to double as a diaper bag, zinc and magnesium supplements and a bright blue rug. There’s, say, an 87 percent chance that she’s pregnant and that her delivery date is sometime in late August.

    • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      They’re probably still listening in though.

      Maybe? But also I’ve never seen any evidence of them listening with the mic off or without you saying the “wake word”.

    • @SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      Didn’t they just pass a law to make all that illegal spying legal, like that changes anything? Seems obvious if your phone is listening in a device like this will be used no matter what setting you use. I remember Amazon being caught leaving their mics on and also Facebook sending conversations to 3rd parties for transcribing. And this is just a small fraction of the shit we know about.