artisanrox to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 6 months agoNo. Ffffk them rules and also your empathy.media.kbin.socialimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1179arrow-down10
arrow-up1179arrow-down1imageNo. Ffffk them rules and also your empathy.media.kbin.socialartisanrox to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 6 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-square@BeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilink9•edit-26 months agoFunny how you read stuff Read the post from the M.D. about waitperson, think “Is this the bad part?” Read the “No” … Read the title about empathy. Re-read both the M.D. post and “No”, aaah now I got it 💡
minus-square@xeekei@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months ago“Waitperson” is kinda lame too, tho. Call them “waiters” ffs. When we stopped calling female actors “actresses” we didn’t start calling them “actpersons”.
minus-squareartisanroxOPlinkfedilink2•6 months agoYES totally understandable. That’s why I did the title like how it is, or people would (understandably) make the awful mistaken conclusion I think Doris is cool or something.
Funny how you read stuff
“Waitperson” is kinda lame too, tho. Call them “waiters” ffs.
When we stopped calling female actors “actresses” we didn’t start calling them “actpersons”.
YES totally understandable. That’s why I did the title like how it is, or people would (understandably) make the awful mistaken conclusion I think Doris is cool or something.