• EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, absolutely. Dunk tank content removed under rule 8 (and even before it was formalised) is always some random irrelevant take posted by a nobody with no platform, of which there are literally hundreds of millions on the internet. I think the most notable posting we’ve ever even had to actually think about whether rule 8 applies is some small time twitch streamer with under 1000 followers who posted something racist on twitter.

    The goal of rule 8 is and has always been to limit the absolute dogshit takes that random bluesky accounts nobody’s heard of, shitty YouTube commenters, or bad Facebook posts made by some random guy you used to work with 5 years ago.

    The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power, without having to wade an endless supply of boring bad takes from nobodies in order to find something worth dunking on.

    The rule has been explained multiple times, your disagreement with the rule does not make it unclear.

    • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      We are literally just wasting time by shitposting on the internet. I don’t see why we need to have any sort of standards at all. This is just mods being busybodies for the sake of being busybodies.

      the_dunk_tank becomes a hell-hole of slop? Great, let the piggies feed. There are like 1000 active users on this site, it’ll be fine.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power,

      Why exactly does posting have to be praxis and how is making fun of an Elon Musk tweet praxis, im begging you to explain this

      • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Posting isn’t praxis, nor does it need to be. You can quit JAQing off and “begging for an explanation” now.

        It’s pretty clear at this point that no amount of explanation is going to be sufficient for you given the way you’ve continued to antagonize both moderators and everyone else who has tried to clarify the situation to you in this and previous threads.

      • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s not about being praxis; it’s about the quality of content.

        And it’s also about not spending all your time finding every last person who said something that sucks. It’s not healthy to do that shit.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Okay, well, that’s what it sounds like when the posts have to be about someone “near the levers of power.” If it is not about that and is instead about the quality of the posts, I ask once again the question. Why is a picture of an Elon Musk tweet inherently a higher quality post than a picture of a tweet by someone with fewer followers?

          • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Do you seriously not understand the difference between some 0 follower twitter account and dunking on Elon fucking Musk?

            We can just post the low hanging fruit to shitreactionariessay on lemmygrad.

            Such a weird hill to die on.

          • because its fucking elon musk, a person people know and have an effect on real world policies and a vast amount of people

            vs an actual nobody

            you need to stop, you’re reaching into the nonsensical in order to argue at this point

            • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              because its fucking elon musk

              This is literally not an explanation, you’re just repeating the assertion I questioned. I could make just as valid an argument the other way around. Posts of Elon Musk tweets are inherently low quality. Why? Because it’s fucking Elon Musk. Also I have an even stronger argument, it’s because I can go see Elon Musk tweets any time I want by typing www.twitter.com into my address bar. It is higher effort and higher quality to post things that I would not otherwise have found