• BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh my god I hate that pirate software guy. He started popping up on my youtube and he is the most annoying know it all I have ever seen on there (i’m being dramatic) and his takes are so bad. He is seemingly very pro drm and pro live service games.

    BECAUSE HE PUBLISHES THOSE GAMES.

    I really can’t stand the guy.

    Rant over.

      • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Just a heads up, a lot of his anti-piracy measures in his games are things like using the achievement system in steam to track your progress and stuff like that. So if you pirate them it checks for your achievements for that game, which you are unable to get, and then fucks with your ability to progress in the game.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s like how “Hacker News” is a bunch of corpo bootlickers that wear the dessicated dried husk of punk/rebellion like a cape.

            • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              every libertarian thinks they’re Luffy when they’re Blackbeard down to the fucking bone. truly sickening individuals. repulsive ideology that turns all it touches into unadulterated misery. the only pearly gates they will behold are the ones to the temple on Little St. James corporate-art

                • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  yiiking-out
                  you don’t UNDERSTAND you DONT GET IT it’s HIP to PLEDGE FEALTY TO FAANG COMPANIES it’s SUBVERSIVE to DO VIGILANTISM ON HOMELESS PEOPLE it’s ALT to EXPLOIT DEVELOPING BRAINS FOR MAXIMUM AD REVENUE i’m WITH IT i’m THE COUNTERCULTURE i’m THE DISRUPTOR i’m REBELLING i’M THE REVOLUTION AND I’M THE FUCKING GRIM REAPER! I’M MY OWN KING! I’M MY OWN GOD! DEATH FOR THE MARKET. DEATH FOR ELON. KILL FOR ELON. EVERYONE ELSE AGREES WITH ME, THEY KNOW IT DEEP DOWN. I’M THE VOCAL MINORITY SPEAKING FOR THE SILENT MAJORITY. I’LL FUCKING KILL YOU IF YOU SHARE WITH PEOPLE

    • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      i saw a short of this guy saying he hates mr robot because apparently the production team stole his code without crediting him to use in one of the episodes, weird story

      • TechnoUnionTypeBeat [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be fair, and I fucking hate the guy, they took information from a cryptography write-up about Defcon that included someone’s personal phone number, which resulted in the guy getting flooded with calls

        Now why the fuck a “security analyst” like Thor didn’t think to sanitze his fucking text is another question entirely

        • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This is because he was, despite his mythologizing, not very good at his job. He was a nepo hire, and basically got paid to prank people and call it security testing.

          In theory, that can help tighten security, but in reality, it only marginally helps, because (and say it with me) the vast majority of leaks and security breachs are internal, from disgruntled employees, and Blizzard was/is a really, really crappy place to work, something that Thor himself literally acknowledges.

          And he says this despite also mythologizing the CEO that much of the bad shit happened under, blaming middle management for ‘obscuring the vision’, as if CEO’s aren’t also blood-sucking reptiles more than half the time.

            • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Most of this stuff is in his YouTube shorts, which is where I first ran into him. He has a lot of cute ferret content, but things just started adding up over the way he presented things and his strange takes. If you have the patience to go through his content, it’s all there out in the open. He doesn’t obfuscate, he just always has good spin on things, and isn’t quite able to put it together when he’s fucked something up because he has lived an incredibly charmed life.

              I will say, one of the things he said that has always stuck with me is that Blizzard usually makes more money on a single WoW mount drop, than they have for the entire existence of SC2. Which explains why WoW is still garbage despite years of tweaks and overhauls.

              Edit: He really loves making diagrams, as if it adds an extra layer of truth to whatever he’s saying. Probably convincing to a layman or someone who hasn’t worked in corporate America for a long time, but it’s just like, ‘You aren’t saying anything complex, you don’t need a diagram for it.’

              • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                I remember him diagraming his wage for his “this is why Blizzard needs a union” short and he literally just wrote the numbers he just said.

                I think he probably does it for the thumbnails. People are more likely to click if they see an inscrutable diagram. I know I am…

        • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because everyone in the industry is either a script kiddie or a disenfranchised sysadmin who is in the process of de-technifying their personal lives.

          Security wankers are the fucking worst as well.

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Guy who is the director of strategy for a publisher that only has thus far worked on a live-service game:

    guys pleaaase don’t regulate live-service boowomp
    we need a totally-deregulated industry for uhh innovation and stuff boowomp
    do you want politicians telling you what games to play boowomp
    this will kill the cash flow boowomp
    what if people do sabotage to accelerate end-of-life to get private servers boowomp
    please do not consider whether or not this is more likely or better than a studio just killing their own servers and litigating against people who try to preserve the game boowomp
    its totally unsustainable to have right-to-repair erm uh emulation uuuuuhhhhh sorry post-end-of-life preservation boowomp
    it’s disrespectful to holy IP praise be boowomp
    you had the game for ten years already boowomp
    who really cares about art preservation anyways boowomp
    this is tyranny boowomp

  • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    also does Thor seriously think that the game companies won’t advocate for their case to the EU legislature once the initiative is raised into parliament??? Does he think that direct democracy exists like that at this very moment? The law is just enshrined from the initiative itself immediately? no process, no consultation, no bureaucracy, nothing??? Thor. Buddy. I’m giving you all the respect I can physically muster and am going to put aside your blatant conflict of interest and assume you genuinely believe this and genuinely worry outside of your own benefit here—are you fucking five years old? Do you have any idea of how government works? Do you pay attention to anything at all?

    For someone who is supposedly a fierce union advocate, this tantrum betrays a toddler’s understanding of how actual corporate-subject bargaining works. It is the responsibility of the party adversarial to the status quo to present a radical view of change that puts the entrenched entity on the backfoot.

    If you were to do what Thor says and present an ironed-out compromise plan as your first card, you’re sacrificing your queen to capture an undeveloped pawn. You absolutely do not know ball. They’ll kill you. What about the past three decades of Democratic Party strategy has convinced you that compromising at the start is a way to affect change??? You create the conditions for a compromise plan by getting those benefiting from a lack of change worried that they’ll face significant material consequences that would make their current mode of profit unsustainable, and then you negotiate with their brokers.

    This is the same fucking repulsive logic that has radlibs scolding people for using their vote as a bargaining chip and not pledging fealty immediately to the Nothing Will Fundamentally Change Train after the Great Vibe Shift. You don’t get anything from capitalists and power brokers unless they’re scared. You have to scare them.

    • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I generally enjoy Thor’s content but I was about to go insane watching his videos on this. The examples only work if you presume that this proposal would somehow replace both copyright and cyber crime legislation, it’s fucking insane. And like you said, as if this wouldn’t be challenged and changed when it actually becomes some kind of legislation proposition. You don’t start a bargain by cutting back your own demands, it’s so goddam stupid.

      • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        if you move your goal to the half, the midfield shifts to their fourth. it’s not hard to grasp. either he doesn’t see this as a negotiation (in which case he has a middle-school understanding of civics and should get the fuck off his high horse about it) or he’s intentionally fearmongering to snuff out the demand for change (in which case he’s a bad actor and is acting on his conflict of interest and thus loses every ounce of credibility he’s mustered as a sort-of everyman game dev)

        • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          either he doesn’t see this as a negotiation (in which case he has a middle-school understanding of civics and should get the fuck off his high horse about it)

          He doesn’t even understand the most basic facts about the legal system in question - he was going on about “b-but what if it sets a bad precedent”… the EU does not use fucking common law (completely, now that the Brits are out). They don’t give a shit about precedents (well, at least they give less of a shit than a common law system would)!

    • AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is the responsibility of the party adversarial to the status quo to present a radical view of change that puts the entrenched entity on the backfoot.

      If you were to do what Thor says and present an ironed-out compromise plan as your first card, you’re sacrificing your queen to capture an undeveloped pawn. You absolutely do not know ball. They’ll kill you.

      I admittedly have no personal experience with these kinds of negotiations, but this is something that worried me about Ross’ recent Q&A video. I think the intention was to assuage people that think the proposal is too extreme (misguided, IMO, since literally any regulation is viewed as extreme by his real opponents), but he gave his personal minimum non-negotiables that would be compromises from the currently stated position. He qualified this by saying that it’s his own personal views and doesn’t reflect the views of the movement as a whole, but surely you’ve got to show a united front on this, right? My immediate thought was that the EU software association negotiators would be kicking their lips, since that should establishing a ceiling for what they’d accept and they’d obviously go down from there.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Drafting full legal documents covering every edge case seems to be main idea for a legislation in EU, and then liberast dorks complain there is way too much legislation going. Then again there was the case where EU had to add that ALL the cows they give subsidies for need to be real and alive because some guys in Romania i think got few years worth of subsidies for a thriving cow farm which was 95% virtual.

  • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    isn’t this person’s whole shtick making shitty takes so they can farm views on youtube and redirect people to their stream?