• Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sweden didn’t provide ammunition, equipment, or men. It provided knowledge. Your example is bad.

    People like you are always hilarious. It’s like “we will not take part in the alliance because there is a potential that maybe, who knows, some of the knowledge we shared might be used incorrectly”.

    Grow up. The world is not black and white, it’s not simple, and people are not all-knowing.

    • QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      we will not take part in the alliance because there is a potential that maybe, who knows, some of the knowledge we shared might be used incorrectly

      NATO action and support has only ever been used for bad

      Grow up. The world is not black and white, it’s not simple, and people are not all-knowing.

      The world may not be black or white but that does not mean all good and bad is equivalent. The US is particularly egregious support for them since 1949 should be shameful and disencouraged where possible. The world would be net better if the US empire crumbled.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        NATO action and support has only ever been used for bad

        As we already established, you have no clue what NATO is or what it does

        The world would be net better if the US empire crumbled.

        No, because then the russian and Chinese empires would rear their heads. The world would be better off if ALL empires crumbled.