Also a great way to make the enemy fight to the death, causing you more casualties in the process. What a dumbass.
I think that’s the intent here. They need a new forever war.
Different scope, though. I don’t think quarter or no quarter affects the whole country’s willingness to surrender (the chance of that is basically zero either way), but it does affect individuals. If you have a few enemy combatants holed up somewhere, it could cost you a lot of people, ammo and time you’d rather spend somewhere else to take them out. They know they can’t win, and it’s either surrender or die. But if surrender means death, they’ll definitely not surrender. Now you need to eliminate them the hard way.
Of course, doing it that way requires more resources, which I guess is good for business in the military industrial complex.
I’m sure Trump has convinced himself that if we’re in the middle of a meat grinder war, we won’t want to “switch horses midstream,” the phrase Nixon used to convince people to vote for him in 1972, so he could finish the war.
Trump thinks we’ll beg him to remain in office and fight this war as only he knows how to do.
The dream of any fascist.
Where are the repercussions though? I’m not sure laws mean anything anymore… other than being a tool of oppression of course.
I think the world has to sanction the US. The mechinisms to prevent and punish whats going on from within have failed. The rest of the world has to stand up and say No.
But it’s spreading fast to other countries too.
I think we’re beyond the point of sanctioning the US being effective. We have carrier groups all over the world. If the regime wanted it? They can get more.
Denying the use of ports is a good start.
You just know the defense will be “he doesn’t know what it means, he just heard it in a movie once and thought it sounded badass”.
Right now, nothing, because his party controls both houses in Congress.
In the future, the potential for consequences does exist, but who knows if we’ll see them
American admin war crimes don’t get punished by either party.
Who do these guys think their impressing with their movie tough guy behavior? It’s just pathetic and weak.
It’s fanatascism.
Even Russia takes prisoners…
Its how you get your own people back in trades…
Have you not seen what Trump said about POWs like McCain?
Trump doesn’t want to get any POWs back.
I vaguely recall it was something very offensive, but cant remember what.
That’s a safe bet. He said he was a loser for getting shot down basically.
Suckers, as well.
Why would you want captured losers to come back?
Jesus this man is a fucking idiot.
This dude is so extreme and fascist its kinda unbelievable from straight up sharing posts that women shouldn’t vote to upfront not even trying to hide it christian nationalism and crusade worship.
To be fair, he probably thinks the phrase means not to give the enemy money.
“No quarters or dollars for you!!”
This happened to me once. Got a dollar fifty in fucking pennies, didn’t even piss them off they legit just had that many pennies and I rolled bad.
There is both decency and negotiating leverage that could have been obtained by rescuing the Iranian ship they ambushed. US is planning an extremely low probability of success escort or landing mission, where standards of military decency would make US troops less scared.
as the great Shit-zu said,
when attacking an army leave no escape, no path for retreat. that’ll teach them to fuck with us!
This dude though call pf duty was real life
That pic of him screams IN A VAN, DOWN BY THE RIVER.
Im getting shades of “child that doesnt want to eat his vegetables”, and a note of “incel incapable of finding a willing sexual partner”
I’m sure there are women who would date that guy.
sure, insufferable women who value themselves less than a pet.
You ever suspect certain people were given government jobs because someone thought they were an asshole and decided they should be set up to go to prison? Hegseth seems like he was put in office for the specific purpose of taking a fall like the idiot he is.
And given they explicitly offered to accept all surrendering individuals the choice to surrender without being charged you don’t think maybe they were talking about the regime itself a regime that has betrayed that trust itself, also it’s not even true since they offer the regime the choice of unconditional surrender qn absolute surrender is not a war crime that is just rejecting false surrender and faking a surrender is a war crime.
Do you really think one comma and one period is enough punctuation for an entire paragraph?
That just aligns with the all of the shit take he’s spouting. You can see where his priorities lie.
