• Watermark710@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      From the article:

      None of this is illegal as currently constituted, because the permit that was written does not require monitoring for the things the independent lab found.

      No law is being broken. This may be terrible, but it’s legal.

    • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      If our government isn’t up to holding criminals responsible, then it needs to be replaced root to stem.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why no photo?
    Seems like a photo of a pipe dislodging black sludge next to a photo of a tesla factory in a news page would instill a better sense of “evil corporation” to me.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      This article links to another article that has it on video and photographed. You can see the clearly black liquid flowing into the clear water in the drainage ditch. Helps to click the link and read the article!

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I did and expected to find an image in the article. See, had I posted this on lemmy, I’d have posted an article closer to the source, with the photos. I assumed others would do the same. I assume too much, sorry.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yea I’d rather have something closer to the source as well but maybe they don’t wanna give MSNBC the traffic as readily 🤷

  • mecen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why bother with expensive waste disposing process when you can just dump it somewhere.

    • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think that the crew shouldn’t be held accountable and are victims themselves. So they should be treated with kindness. But in light of this case of course that is more likely to happen than seeing any real consequences for people in charge.

  • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    245
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    So, which entry-level employee with no ability to be responsible for this will be fired, and how big will the fine they won’t have to pay be?

    • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Companies don’t make structural mistakes. They are famously individualistic and unorganized and all illegal acts are by lone wolves and bad apples. All good work is done by CEO or the board. The rest of the individuals are parasites

      /s in case someone needs

  • X@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Per the article:

    The sample was collected on April 7. Eurofins issued its results on April 10. According to the lab report, the 24-hour composite found:

    • Hexavalent chromium at 0.0104 milligrams per liter, just above the lab’s reporting limit of 0.01 mg/L. Hexavalent chromium is classified as a known human carcinogen by the US National Toxicology Program. It is the substance the Erin Brockovich case was built around.

    • Arsenic at 0.0025 mg/L. That is below the federal drinking water standard of 0.01 mg/L, but present.

    • Strontium at 1.17 mg/L. Mazloum’s technical report on the findings noted that long-term exposure can affect bone density and kidney function in humans and wildlife.

    • Lithium and vanadium at concentrations Lazarte’s letter described as abnormally high relative to rainwater or normal groundwater.

    • Elevated levels of manganese, iron, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium consistent with industrial discharge. Manganese, a battery process tracer, can have neurological effects at chronic doses. Excess phosphorus can cause algae blooms that strip oxygen from waterways.

    • Ammonia in the form of nitrogen at 1.68 mg/L, amplifying the algae bloom risk

    • hissing meerkat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s a suspiciously low level of arsenic. Where is the arsenic from their wells or municipal water ending up or are they clandestinely pumping river water?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 days ago

        It can. But you’d need a facility built to do it.

        If you don’t anticipate Strontium in your wastewater, you’re not going to build a system to leech it out or neutralize it.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Isn’t that the important part of the story? Effing Texas regulators didn’t detect Strontium (or other pollutants the factory didn’t mention) so didn’t test for it?

          We’re so used to the idea that companies will do the least they are mandated to, but isn’t that why we have regulators? If I get a new water heater I’m required to have an inspector sign off and his job is to flag anything that is off. Why can’t a multibillion dollar industrial facility be held to the same standard?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Effing Texas regulators didn’t detect Strontium (or other pollutants the factory didn’t mention) so didn’t test for it?

            I mean, they did. That’s how we know about it. But what can they actually do about it? Prince Abbott will just cover this up and fire anyone who won’t shut up about it.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              It was an independent lab that tested it because the ditch owners thought something was wrong. Tesla claims they also measured it incorrectly, but you can’t really dispute the color coming out, so something is in it.

              Even if they did measure it incorrectly though, it’s going to be hard to dispute the lithium fingerprint they found, it would only be the other chemicals that become questionable. Seems like such a simple answer is to re-test it and re-test it immediately, and put them under extended re-testing scrutiny if the re-test comes back clean (maybe they changed something to fake the new test). Also re-test where the “incorrect” test was done to see if it gets similar results there as well. It’s not even pocket change to Tesla, it’s like a piece of lint in the pocket that a penny has touched change.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                It was an independent lab that tested it

                It was a public drainage district - specifically, Nueces County Drainage District No. 2 - that requested the lab be performed. These are municipal offices within the structure of the County that stumbled on a pipe authorized by the state and misused by Tesla’s facilities.

                This is effectively a dispute between the county and the state, wherein the state has authorized dumping it should not have the legal authority to provide.

            • towerful@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              If a discharge pipe is traced back to a company - and it is discharging unsafe levels or typically unexpected chemicals - then it should be on that company to get their waste water into a manageable condition.

              Just because a municipal/council/whatever has above average water processing, doesn’t mean companies get a free pass to abuse it

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Deregulated Red Run Oblast problems and the voters continue to support it. “Ain’t shit gonna happen to the dirty neo-Nazi.” Good luck with the lack of potable water situation you morons.

  • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    What it did not do, explicitly, was grant Tesla the right to use public or private property for wastewater conveyance. The drainage district that manages the ditch the pipe was discharging into was never notified that the permit existed. Its workers found out the way drainage district workers in any small Texas county find out about things: by walking the ditch and seeing something new.

    If the discharge permit is a good thing or a bad thing for the environment is another topic. But right now this seems to be the only legal issue in the room, right?

    At least one that implicates Tesla. The people that permitted them to discharge and didn’t include relevant pollutant values in said discharge are having a bad day enjoying their private yacht.