TL;DR: The iconic desert landscapes from the movie belong to Western Sahara which is under Moroccan occupation. The indigenous population, Sahrawis, are marginalised by the Moroccan regime, who arrest natives for filming their own land while giving complete permission and assistance to Western film producers to shoot their scenes.
I highly recommend reading the article as it’s written by one of the locals themselves.
Why YSK: Seeing how The Odyssey has amassed popularity globally, it is important to know how the illegal occupation of the Western Sahara and the suffering of the inhabitants was swept under the rug in order to produce this film, especially since no other major media outlet wishes to cover this topic.
Western Sahara.
Another story of postcolonial greed. Fight for resources, fuck the people (and call them terrorists when they fight for their own land).
Once saw a docu on that, it’s horrifying, not least because so few people are aware.
Please also be aware that when you buy produce from Morocco, esp. tomatoes iirc, it’s likely to be grown in Western Sahara in a very exploitative way.
Thanks for making it a YSK (but imho Western Sahara should be in the title).
so you’re saying I shouldn’t PAY to watch this movie… wouldn’t want to give my hard earned money to anyone taking advantage of such a situation.
The movie was good enough to dull existence for the nearly 3 hour runtime. That said, I will probably never choose to watch it again. So there’s Fudgy’s review.
That twist in the middle with John Odyssey was cool tho
I hear his secret evil twin brother Billy Odyssey ran away with the secret fifth element, Heart, in the (secret) third act
I wish I knew about this fact before I went to watch the film
Meanwhile if any of these people try to escape this oppression by migrating anywhere they’ll get treated like terrorists
They filmed in Western Sahara? 💀 Discussion should’ve been focused on that instead of the races of the actors
That’s messed up and all but I don’t think this is holding back the booming Western Saharan movie industry.
See also: Dobby’s grave
It’s a movie about war, is it not?
Also terribly inaccurate. Clytemnestra was slay though
But did it goes to film in as a way to go through into the main places that be are and in on to be? Obviously, but not whether it won’t will to be, and then it is, as it does. Not that I do that sort of thing, y’know?
I, uh…do not know.
You lying apparition of my own malaised mind, get going, get the god damn capella outta your Ruby Tuesdays, it is now time to vamoose as I have a large scale bowel movement, at least a category three with much moonlighting in the kumquat Comcast complicity confinement, obviously. You dig, or do I have to get rid of a fistula for you good sir and/or ma’am and/or etc?
Wut
Wat wat in the butt
Carry on
No u
“Moroccan-occupied Western Sahara”
As a Moroccan, I don’t need to read any further than the first line. Sahara is part of Morocco, not occupied by it. So for me the rest should be is not very credible.
On 10 December 2020, US President Donald Trump proclaimed that the United States recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara.
The authority you’re appealing to is Donald Trump? And you think that makes you look like the good guy?
You may need to read the wikipedia article to get a better view on my point of view. I only cited one is Trump because he is USA president. Which is a big powerful nation and is very popular. Have I had cited minister of Kenya, it would not get as much impact. Also “In July 2023, Israel officially recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara”.
The idea here is not providing an argument of authority. Rather demonstrating that Morocco is not occupying Sahara and countries are agreeing to that.
Trump recognizing Morrocan sovereignty is not the argument you think it is.
Trump supporting your stance is not the flex you believe it is
