• @y2cwr2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    18511 months ago

    As a software engineer I find it miraculous the amount of people that whine about somebody wanting to get paid for putting weeks, months, and years of their life into a product 100s of thousands of people CHOOSE to use.

    • @stillwater@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      So many people sound more like “What do you mean making a website costs more than $20?” types than they realize.

    • @Serpent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Have been using the Sync reddit app daily for years after paying a couple of quid to remove ads whenever I did that. Felt like a steal then and expensive now so, on balance, I’m comfortable having paid the ad randsome. I feel better knowing it all goes to the developer for his personal efforts.

    • Regular Human
      link
      fedilink
      2511 months ago

      And it’s a very high quality app, to boot. I’ve been a mobile software engineer for more than a decade and this level of polish doesn’t just happen by accident

    • @fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2111 months ago

      Same. I’m very grateful for the FOSS options, they’re like a public option. They create a baseline that paid apps have to surpass, but there’s nothing wrong with devs getting paid for their work and that payment shouldn’t have to be at the whims of donations. I view it as more choice and more choice is good. This is a small dev on an open platform that can’t lock out FOSS options. It’s not a mega corp building a monopoly. Sync is not hurting anyone by being a paid option.

      • @urkindagood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        It’s not a mega corp building a monopoly. Sync is not hurting anyone by being a paid option.

        Wouldn’t they see this as a dev trying to make some fortune over non-profit service?

        Not sure though if the dev already automatically donates a portion of his sells to lemmy.

        • @sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Wouldn’t they see this as a dev trying to make some fortune over non-profit service?

          On the other hand, I’d like to see how the donations to the non-profit are being utilized. At least with for-profit we know what’s what.

    • @BrooklynRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      The way i look at is if you give me a good app(sync) with good functionality and a nice ui I don’t mind seeing ad’s or throwing some money the devs way.

      My big issue with the reddit app was there was no equivalent exchange going on i had a shitty app with awful ui that was buggy slow showed me adds and tracked my data I didn’t get anything from that so I had to stop.

      • @Rossel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        40
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They get completely disabled if you pay, that’s the point. I haven’t got a single tracking ping on my PiHole, I bought adfree.

          • Victron
            link
            fedilink
            2811 months ago

            Sync is no spying no shit, google ads spy as much as they do in any other site or app you use

          • @uSirPatrick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2111 months ago

            Dawg, I have Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and a phone OS owned by Google… If sync spying on me is the worst part then I’m doing pretty good.

            I pay 2 bucks a month to show the dev I appreciate his hard work.

          • @Rossel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            17
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Not Sync directly, it’s AdMob and Google. And I paid mainly to support LJ for making one of my favorite apps ever, as I said, I have a PiHole

          • bluejay
            link
            fedilink
            1411 months ago

            I paid for Sync to toss some money to a dev responsible for the #1 used app on any of my phones for the last 10 years. I paid a criminally low amount back then for how much I used the app.

            It happened to also come with ad removal, but I block those and trackers on my network anyway.

        • @codemaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -85
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          My trust was already broken. These lemmy instances come free of charge, free of ads and free of trackers, and this pig of a dev comes around and pulls out an à la spez shenanigan and everyone praises him. He should be keelhauled. And the lemmy servers should block apps that insert ads unless they share profits. I’d be happy to pay for features that add to lemmy, not for features that were taken away. Fuck sync for lemmy. There, i said it

            • @havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -2011 months ago

              Freeloading, hmm?

              When was the last time you made a unprompted decision to donate to the Lemmy devs?

          • @Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2111 months ago

            If they demand payment for third party dev they wouldn’t be free open source anymore, your argument is asinine. If you don’t want to use a paid app then don’t, stop acting like someone else doing it is in some way hurting you personally.

            • @havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -1011 months ago

              Not getting into this argument because I personally don’t give a shit about the whole situation, but that isn’t really how FOSS works.

              The software itself is free, the servers themselves are a service however. That is not free, it may be free to US, but somebody is footing the bill.

              That being said, if the sync developer is developing an app for a platform that itself does not use ads and relies solely on donation, ethically speaking he should at least donate some of the profit to the Lemmy devs (even if just 1%), considering that the app DOES rely on their software and they themselves are not seeing any of those funds whatsoever. I have no problem with donations whatsoever, but keep in mind that it isn’t like sync is the greatest creation ever made and is totally self reliant, it 100% depends on Lemmy itself to function.

              Whether he does or not doesn’t matter to me because jerboa works perfectly fine for me, but that is just my .02. People are really getting way too fucking heated about this shit and seeing it start to infect spaces like shitpost is honestly turning me off to Lemmy.

              People are treating the app like the second coming of Christ FFS.

              • @Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                411 months ago

                It is.

                Correct, the use of the service at the moment is free the fee l third party creators are charging for their service in development of that particular interface. They’re free to do that.

                Who says he doesn’t? You legit don’t know what deal they may or may not have, stop assuming.

                Bro it’s shit post… What standards are you holding it to here lol.

                No people are overdueing a joke as always on shit post and as usual people hop in and get way too serious about throwaway jokes.

                • @havokdj@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 months ago

                  If he is donating, then he should tell people that he is donating. The whole idea of “if you tell people of your goodwill then you undid your goodwill” is stupid. Yes, you shouldn’t do something good with the expectation of a reward, but that’s different when you are selling a product.

                  It’s not even just about goodwill, it is also about longevity of the platform.

                  However, considering the facts that he is running ads and charging for ad-free access, I doubt he is donating by default unless he specifically mentions it.

                  Also, I’m not holding any standard here, it’s just that like, shitpost is for actual shitposts. This isn’t a shitpost, it’s just starting another argument. It’s like the porn spam in /b/, there are other boards for that.

                  It’s also not just here, I’m seeing boards everywhere popping up with this argument. It is getting old.

          • Victron
            link
            fedilink
            2011 months ago

            Yeah, how come some nefarious people charge for a calendar app, if days are free!!?oneTurd D:<.

            /S

          • @unscholarly_source@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            How do I give more money than I already have to this pig of a dev who made the Lemmy experience so great to me and countless others such that it is now in the top 10 social apps on the Play store?

          • @angelorohit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            I’m confused. Are you suggesting a better way to monetize non-paying users or are you saying that the dev should make the app free for everyone to use without ads?

            • @codemaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -2311 months ago

              He should not add anti-features where there are none and then ask for money to remove them. That’s just being an asshole. He should ask for money for good features that lemmy lacks, not turn Lemmy into Reddit

      • @timbuck2themoon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        That’s where I’m at. Don’t care that it’s not FOSS or the Dev charges. I just wouldn’t support an app that puts trackers and ads on a product that inherently doesn’t. Putting it behind a paywall wouldn’t bother me a bit.

        That said, that’s why I don’t use it nor support it but don’t give a shit if someone else does.

  • El Barto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14011 months ago

    Can’t we just be happy that we’re not on Reddit instead of fighting over which UI we prefer!?

    • Match!!
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9611 months ago

      Maybe the real Reddit was the arguments with friends we made along the way

    • RQG
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Many of us left reddit due to which AI UI we prefer. So I can see why this happens now.

      • @socksy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        Not picking on you, but I see people use “AI” instead of “UI” more and more these days and I wonder if it’s part of the reason all startups suddenly feel like they have to introduce AI features — everyone keeps talking about how important it is after all

        • RQG
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          In my case it is auto correct on my phone. Maybe because people text about AI so much that their auto correct thinks it is supposed to be AI instead of UI. Like mine did.

      • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 months ago

        I thought it was due to wanting to try a non corporate alternative to social media. Before Spez mishandling of the incident I was ready to just use old.reddit.com on Firefox and figure out how to get RES onto mobile, or just use it less and more on desktop only. Had he just quietly let the protest pass by without throwing a tantrum I’d probably still be using reddit.

        • RQG
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          That plays a role for a lot of people probably. I’d think the majority got ripped over the edge by the third party app thing because the default UI in the app and browser are just worse.

        • @Neve8028@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Had he just quietly let the protest pass by without throwing a tantrum I’d probably still be using reddit.

          Honestly, if reddit has just been upfront and said “we need to consolidate where people browse our site on mobile for our IPO”, people would still have been annoyed but i don’t think all the drama would have taken place. The issue was really just in the way that the management handled the situation by giving devs a “fuck you” API pricing and acting like TPA devs were being unreasonable for not wanting to pay the ridiculous fees. If they had just been upfront and honest then I don’t think I’d be here on lemmy.

      • @Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Didn’t most of us? If you were happy using reddit app you are almost certainly still drooling on yourself scrolling through the super sexy posts on /askreddit and think Lemmy is probably the name of a band that nerds like.

    • @Haha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      I use two and it’s okay. I uninstalled Reddit app today and deleted every account. I already had did it on the main start of July but the other accounts had to follow through

    • @TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -6
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m not fighting, I just want sync users to shut the fuck up and stop advertising their app at every possible minute, because those of us who aren’t using it have already decided it isn’t the one for us.

  • @electriccarsOP
    link
    9211 months ago

    My reply to all the naysayers:

    Thanks for making Lemmy feel like home, it wouldn’t without you!

    The reality is it’s a free world, regardless of what morality you put on things there are going to be things that happen that you don’t like. That’s life.

    Like it or not Lemmy has had explosive growth because of apps like Sync. Because of them being killed off by Reddit. If it weren’t for the drama of Reddit doing that, I and millions of other users wouldn’t be here right now as we’d still be on Reddit.

    Even people who weren’t using the 3rd party apps left Reddit because Reddit’s actions left a bad taste in their mouths.

    So, morality of one guy charging for his honest work in creating the paid or ad supported app aside, you should be thanking the apps including sync for helping drive so many users to Lemmy.

    If you yourself don’t want to use a paid app, then that’s okay! We’re all allowed to respond or react to things how we want, but being incredibly divisive for something that a lot of people wanted and that really is inconsequential is almost universally frowned on.

    Just let people do what they want and don’t shoot them down for it. More options for browsing Lemmy = more Lemmings = more content.

    Much love my dudes! We may disagree on this but we agree on many many many more things I’m sure, just because we’re on Lemmy instead of Reddit in the first place is proof of that! ✌️

    • Victron
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      Well put. Also, I hope this whole topic dies soon.

      • @electriccarsOP
        link
        511 months ago

        Me too. I can’t wait for the next subject of Lemmy drama! It makes me feel alive! 😂

  • C3D
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    8611 months ago

    People care too much about which app you use. At the end of the day, as long as you’re happy with sync it shouldn’t matter

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1611 months ago

      I agree, just wish they would stop mentioning how their app is “just so great and only $20 to get no ads” in every single thread and every other post on every instance

      • @Klystron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 months ago

        My comment to that is in every single thread and every other post on every other instance someone is saying how sync is ad filled and tracker heavy. So let’s just all agree to never talk about apps, ever.

        • @JDubbleu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          I wasn’t a Sync user on Reddit, but Relay didn’t make it over to Lemmy. Sync has some of the most non-intrusive ads I’ve ever seen, and that’s coming from someone who is extremely anti-ads. They’re very different from the actual posts and super easy to just scroll past. It’s also very clearly made by someone who is great with UI/UX.

      • @electriccarsOP
        link
        1211 months ago

        Oh man, Sync is just so great and only $20 to get no ads you should give it a try!

        Play store link: Sync for Lemmy

      • no banana
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        The only comments I personally see are complaining about the price. Most people just use it. I subscribed instantly and knew I would before the price was revealed. I’m only saying it because it’s on topic now, but tend not to get into the discussion because in the end it’s up to the individual whether or not the cost makes the app worth using.

        • @anonymous_bot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          I use Sync because it was my favorite client for reddit but I’m definitely gonna hold out on paying until there is a sale or something. My usage of Lemmy is not that high at the moment.

          • no banana
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And I would never say that anyone should pay for something unless they feel it to be worth the price. Just like I wouldn’t tell someone not to pay for it because I think the price is too high for me.

            I’ve used Sync for as many years as I was on reddit. I paid almost nothing for the app back then compared to the amount of time I’ve spent on it. I feel like the whole discussion on price is meaningless, really. Some people aren’t gonna like it, some aren’t going to care.

          • no banana
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Hey, I get that. A lot of people over here are very privacy conscious and I’m not against it at all. The dev just hasn’t ever given me a reason to distrust them in all the years I’ve used the app. There’s been a built up trust, so to speak.

            The control of private data is important and when I’m told that the collection stops if I have the ad free version I believe it.

      • MrGerrit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        But that’s more in response to people saying it cost over 100$ to remove ads and it has trackers.

        The ultra life time cost 100$, it stops the ads and also comes with some extra features that isn’t needed to enjoy sync.

        For 20$ the ads will stop and the trackers will be disabled.

        • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          -1411 months ago

          Why would you need to pay $20 to access free content? Devs don’t pay any creator who makes you scroll Lemmy. They are useless and sell you air.

          • MrGerrit
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1611 months ago

            You don’t need to do anything, just keep on using the FOSS apps. It’s all good. It’s all about having choice.

            The content isn’t really “free” the people running the servers need to be paid also. If nobody would donate or they don’t use any other form of getting funds, the servers wouldn’t last.

            Sync just provides a way to get to content in a nice polished way, at least that’s how experience it. I could watch ads but I paid for a more better experience.

            Both need to make money to eat and keep things running.

            When you take a taxi to see a movie, nobody thinks that the taxi driver shouldn’t be paid.

          • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If someone sell an air purifier, would you berate them for selling access to free air? Of course not, you can still access free air without it. The air purifier just make the free air feel nicer, just like sync making browsing free Lemmy contents feel nicer.

            • Aa!
              link
              fedilink
              -611 months ago

              This feels a bit more like setting up a ticket booth outside a public library, and offering a half-assed tour where the guide just reads the signs to you

              I’m going to roll my eyes any time someone says they can’t use the library without it, but you do you. If it keeps y’all reading, then that’s fine.

              • @APassenger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                It’s more like selling seat cushions when the library only has folding chairs.

                Everyone can still go into the library. If you have the means and desire, buy a seat cushion. If not, the books are still there for everyone.

          • arefx
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Why would they pay 20$? Because even if sync is used to access a free service it is a product someone spent their time to make, and is optional. If people want to pay to use the app without ads because they think it’s made better than the others (ignoring the ad and Google tracking on free version it IS one of if not the best app experience for Lemmy) they will. The Lemmy experience on sync is 100% better than on Jerboa for me, and I work hard running my own business so I’m not poor so I already forgot about that 20$ and I’m enjoying lemmy MORE than I was before

            It’s really simple you guys are just grouches.

            ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

            I don’t care what client y’all use as long as people are here and not on reddit

            • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -611 months ago

              Most people don’t care about what client others are using. It’s more the evangelizing of what how $20 isn’t that big a deal that is starting to get annoying. If it was just Sync came out and people who liked it used it then it’d be fine, but then some of you guys are bit too fanatical that you’d go into other communities like liftoff to start arguing about Sync and how $20 is worth paying and the app deserves it and so on, and then trashing the Foss alternatives. Yes we get it you love Sync and is the best app ever, but try and tone it down a bit. It’s more the userbase that is hurting the image right now than anything.

              • arefx
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                I’m not making poats about it I’m simply replying to comments other people are making about it first. Lol

            • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              -811 months ago

              I don’t care about your background, but since you’ve mentioned it, you could’ve dropped $20 to lemmy.ml instead of cashing out for an app that creates problems unless you pay for it, since you throw money around that easy. They need it more than sync devs. This conversation couldn’t have happened if our instances weren’t properly hosted, but they are still availiable on any app you choose.

              • arefx
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                How do you know I haven’t donated to my Lemmy instance?

                And it’s not really throwing money around if it’s something I use daily and get value from, is it? Im not being irresponsible lol my bills are paid my savings grows every week even when I buy myself superficial things, so it’s not really an issue, also why the fuck should you care how I spend my money lmao

                • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -511 months ago

                  By your ‘gotcha’ comeback, silly. Why do you throw at me how happy and financially savvy you are? Did someone hurt you? Why instead of defending your point you prove you are so well-off? It sounds stupid and miserable. I’m nobody on the internet, Idfc about your bills.

                  And I don’t care about you personally, but you and others like you enable sync to thrive. It shall crumble. I lowkey like that sync devs milked some money from ya, but it should’ve happened in a more trad fashion, like MML, cryptoscam or something obvious. It could’ve made easier laughing at you.

        • arefx
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          And it’s not as good of a user experience as sync for Lemmy. I’ve been using jerboa for couple months now and sync smokes it so far. If people want to pay 20$ for a better user experience they will its not complicated. Jerboa feels like an Android app from 2010.

    • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      -3311 months ago

      Unless it should? And we shall bully them? They should feel unneeded there?

      They put ads and ask for cash while showing other people’s free resources they put their mind to create? While no other client do so? And plenty of people\bots enable them? And call that a pointless argument on fediverse? Lmao.

      Their spines should be broken asap, and everything around Lemmy should stay free or donation-based. If it is not, next you see are paywalled apps and instances. No one would benefit from a trend of purchaseable clients but these devs, while they don’t bring content, or anything to the table. Their app is useless without others’ work, and yet they charge you 20-100 bucks for being a middleman between you and it. It’s senseless.

      Fuck sync devs. Fuck sync shills. Fuck them all.

      • @moriquende@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1611 months ago

        They bring something to the table: the app. It’s a lot of work to build an app, and takes a lot of time and knowledge. It’s perfectly okay to monetize your work. If you don’t like it, why not build one yourself? The servers are there, and they are free. So is the documentation, and the protocols.

        • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          -1511 months ago

          Their invasive tactics are concerning. If we’d eat that, other devs may follow. It may become the new reality.

          Servers aren’t free. Donating to your instance is better than paying forban add-free Sync experience. This way you also help other users by making downtime even less noticeable.

          • @moriquende@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            Nothing is free. If you value the app and don’t like ads, pay for it. If not, use a free one or build one yourself. If you value the service a server is providing, pay for it. Why would you want to artificially restrict our possibilities? it’s not like we can only choose one or the other.

            • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              -211 months ago

              The problem isnt that its paid, it’s that they use google AdSense.

              I do not trust a Dev willing to send my data through Google servers.

                • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Well, I don’t use it.

                  But in regards to the payment, Why on earth would I pay a Dev who thinks using Google servers for ads is a good idea?

                  That’s just bad judgement

            • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              -611 months ago

              It may snowball into other apps wanting it too? The first to take this step out of blue is asking to face some resistance. It’s natural. I’m surprised no one else is against them.

              • @moriquende@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                411 months ago

                So? Someone who can’t afford to build an app for free won’t do it if there is no demand for it. People building free open source apps will still do it. I really don’t get the problem…

                • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 months ago

                  Other free services becoming for-profits and add-infested? Sync can set a trend others may follow. As they are first to do so, I’m surprised no one argues thst, as they may set up a degradation of every others’ experience with this platform.

        • arefx
          link
          fedilink
          1111 months ago

          They losing sleep over a Lemmy app of course they are not okay.

          • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            -911 months ago

            Someone should’ve brought it. It’s weird we kinda accepted it once it happened for no reason.

            No sleep lost, lmao, just some corporate time.

            • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
              link
              fedilink
              9
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              You know you can still get your points across without throwing some insults and vitriol, right? You’ll just unnecessarily make people mad and unwilling to listen to your arguments, and make Lemmy as a whole slightly more toxic place in doing so.

      • @electriccarsOP
        link
        811 months ago

        Thanks for making Lemmy feel like home, it wouldn’t without you!

        The reality is it’s a free world, regardless of what morality you put on things there are going to be things that happen that you don’t like. That’s life.

        Like it or not Lemmy has had explosive growth because of apps like Sync. Because of them being killed off by Reddit. If it weren’t for the drama of Reddit doing that, I and millions of other users wouldn’t be here right now as we’d still be on Reddit.

        Even people who weren’t using the 3rd party apps left Reddit because Reddit’s actions left a bad taste in their mouths.

        So, morality of one guy charging for his honest work in creating the paid or ad supported app aside, you should be thanking the apps including sync for helping drive so many users to Lemmy.

        If you yourself don’t want to use a paid app, then that’s okay! We’re all allowed to respond or react to things how we want, but being incredibly divisive for something that a lot of people wanted and that really is inconsequential is almost universally frowned on.

        Just let people do what they want and don’t shoot them down for it. More options for browsing Lemmy = more Lemmings = more content.

        Much love my dude! We may disagree on this but we agree on many many many more things I’m sure, just because we’re on Lemmy instead of Reddit in the first place is proof of that! ✌️

        • @whataboutshutup@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          -211 months ago

          Someone downvoted you for the first paragraph, I guess.

          I don’t think Sync impacted the reach of Lemmy just yet (it rolled out how many days before?) but it would, maybe. Especially for those who used it before.

          I spat acid not because I’m pissed at people who use it or devs especially, but for not seeing any critique. It seems like an important turning point for Lemmy as a community. And no one bat an eye. I acted as a counterbalance. A mad one, and picked some low-stakes fights. It was funny.

          Have a nice day, dude\ss.

  • The dogspaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7811 months ago

    Remember folks whether you choose to use sync or another lemmy app none of us are using reddits shitty mobile app and in that way we are all winners

    • @Absolute_Axoltl@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      This to me is the most salient point. I think this initial noise will fade away once the various options are all available.

      • The dogspaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It will never completely go away because people love to be tribal but it will probably settle into puticular communities where people can talk about the different lemmy apps

    • jrlionheart00
      link
      fedilink
      -211 months ago

      I’m on both so there’s that and I ain’t rebuying sync when all he literally did was a copy and paste job.

      • @ItsTheOnlyWayICanCum@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Are you stupid? The backend is completely different and there are many many changes required since the fundamental concept of federation-based services is different and requires different user decisions, which need a UI. No instances on Reddit, are there? So there’s not an infinite number of log in urls, there is no need to gracefully handle defederation, instance-level blocking, etc.

        It’s not a copy paste job.

        Also, he offers a “restore purchases” button. It’s in settings.

  • @h14h@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7011 months ago

    Honestly I’m using, and especially posting on, Lemmy much more often now that I have sync back.

    I had been using Sync for Reddit for so many years that it became muscle memory. Now I have it back and things just feel right.

    • ijeff
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Do you have access to an unreleased build? Still no post submission functionality on mine just yet (commenting from Sync).

      • @Neve8028@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Sync is still just in beta so a bunch of features are lacking. Post submission will come with time.

        • ijeff
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Definitely. I’m just wondering because they referred to posting on Lemmy more frequently with Sync - curious if there’s another build or whether they meant commenting specifically.

  • @blacklizardplanet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    55
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yeah I feel the same. Used sync for Reddit for YEARS too. I’ve been using Lemmy way more since Sync launched. I’m happy with it 🤷.

    • @Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      2111 months ago

      I used Jeroba while I was waiting for sync to come out. Personally it’s really no competition, it’s great that it is being worked on but Jeroba is significantly worse in every way except for being open source. Hopefully someday it will be great!

      Synk is just so polished comparatively everything else feels unfinished

      • @viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        I ditched Jerboa for Liftoff, and then Liftoff for Thunder because they all kept breaking.

        Thunder was alright, all things considered, but the UI is lacking. Now that Sync is out, I’m back to where I started 12+ years ago.

  • @TheMadnessKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    5311 months ago

    Well Im trying out sync and it’s honestly such a good and polished app. A big Kudos to the dev. Would probably buy the premium if the pricing goes down.

    • @dditty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s definitely the most polished, snappiest, cleanest Lemmy app atm and I am loving it

    • @dlok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Amazing how good it is considering the amount of back end changes needed.

      It was obviously written well with separation of concerns considered so it could be done that way.

  • arefx
    link
    fedilink
    5111 months ago

    Personally, I don’t give a flying fuck what client any of you use as long as you are here. :)

  • @OR3X@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    4511 months ago

    $20 to support a solo dev AND remove ads from his awesome lemmy client? Sweet!

    • Hypnoctopus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Are there any Lemmy apps that actually let you click and highlight a parent comment and then click on a next button to automatically and instantly scroll to the next apparent level comment? RiF (Reddit is fun) had that feature and I can’t believe I’m not seeing it on either connect for Lemmy or that sync app.

    • sarcasticsunrise
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Yeah, why are some people saying it’s a hundred dollars? I’m still using the free version, but my Google Play page is saying 20 bucks. I don’t know where that extra 80 is coming from

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      -18
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      AND remove ads

      See that’s what I find obnoxious. IMO programs should not have advertising because nothing should have advertising. Advertising is capitalist conditioning. It shoves consumerism down our throats. The last thing we need now is more mindless consumption!

      I suppose that if you don’t have any contempt for or opposition to advertising then there really isn’t a reason to complain. But I really wish people would take a stand against advertisement, or more generally capitalism and consumerism. Really, who would choose an application where space is wasted on selling them crap when any other option is available? I think such a choice is influenced by the idea that advertising is an inherent part of life, an idea which needs to be countered whenever it crops up. You should be free to make choices that others find irrational of course, but I still think that we need to step up and counter the logic that advertising is some neutral force.

      If the developer wants to monetize the program, he could find some other way to do it, such as luxury features, premium support, or premium feature requests. However, my view is that things that occur primarily to make money should probably not occur at all, and that they only happen because capitalism has been imposed upon us. Said differently: if you don’t want to develop an app, then just don’t do it. I’m absolutely willing to compensate you for your work, and I know that we all need to make a living (under capitalism!), but if the money is forcing you to do it, then clearly you wouldn’t do it in a free environment [1].

      But at the end of the day, I cannot stress enough how sick I am of being advertised to. No, I don’t want to buy your product. If I want to obtain something, I will go to your website or subscribe to your mailing list, or otherwise proactively indicate my interest. If you want to promote stuff, promote your own stuff or stuff , so ince you think your audience/customers would be interested in, because I’ve already somehow explicitly indicated that I’m interested in your affairs/wares. So I’ve made it a goal to expel advertising from all aspects of my life.

      [1] Yes, this would imply that the vast majority of workers would drop out of the workforce and go do things that they enjoy. This would be a good thing. We don’t need to waste all our time doing “productive” stuff anymore.

      • @electriccarsOP
        link
        2811 months ago

        I too dream of a world where we’ve moved on from capitalism to a socialist utopia like is in the United Federation of Planets, but we are not currently in that world. So until that time, we all have to earn a living to pay our landlords and feed ourselves.

        For most things we are given a choice between ads or paying, and I almost always choose paying for no ads as I can’t stand them either. But until developers can live without bills and only do work for free because they enjoy it, our choice remains pay for no ads or be served ads. So I paid for no ads.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          -411 months ago

          So I deleted the original comment because I found out that there was more to the Sync story than just advertising, and I realized that my comment wasn’t up to snuff. I didn’t mean to deceive anyone.

          But until developers can live without bills and only do work for free because they enjoy it, our choice remains pay for no ads or be served ads.

          That was exactly my point though: we do not have only two choices [(1) to pay for no ads and (2) to be served ads]. I listed some some alternative monetization schemes that don’t encourage consumerism. Namely, premium support for paying users, custom feature requests for users willing to pay the development cost, or luxury features that, while nice to have, aren’t necessary for the functioning of the app.

          This point was probably in response to the section of the deleted comment where I argued that stuff that is done only for money probably shouldn’t happen at all. I stand by that. However, I do recognize the need for developers to eat. (I thought I said as much in the deleted comment.) For this reason, I use all sorts of software that I have paid for, and will continue to do so [2]. However, I will not pay a developer for their software if the functionality they’re selling me is “not having ads,” because ads shouldn’t exist.

          I shouldn’t have to pay for my software not to kick me in the balls; similarly, I shouldn’t have have to pay for my software not to show me ads. Unlike being kicked in the balls [1], every waking moment of my life up until recently has been crammed with ads.

          There are an infinite number of ways to make money that don’t require advertising, and I would be willing to pay for them in general [2]. Hell, I’ll be willing to donate for no reward [2]. I’m not against making money in an arbitrary way (at least under current conditions), but I most certainly oppose advertising as a specific way of making money.

          [1] I’m not “into” that, but in case it isn’t clear, I would rather be kicked in the balls than see one more godforsaken advertisement. I cannot stress enough how much I hate advertising.

          [2] …once I have a non-zero income.

          • @electriccarsOP
            link
            811 months ago

            Instead of seeing it as a charge to remove ads, maybe look at it as buying the ad free app from the dev? That’s how I see it. And giving people the option to use the app for free with ads is IMO a decent trade off.

            • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              maybe look at it as buying the ad free app from the dev?

              I would rather just give the dev money for literally nothing if it allows everyone else an ad-free experience. Literally the second I get a non-zero income, I’ll begin donating to FOSS projects.

              And giving people the option to use the app for free with ads is IMO a decent trade off.

              I mean it’s a better tradeoff than “pay vs. be excluded”, but I don’t think people fully realize the tradeoff they’re making: time is a lot more valuable than money in my view. No matter how much money you throw at the problem, you will eventually run out of time and die. Your time is precious! If that’s the tradeoff you want to make then it would be wrong of me to stop you, but I really wish that people would stop and think “do I really want to spend my finite time on this miserable planet on this?”.

              I’ve spent more than enough of my time being bored by advertisements, and even as I try to remove them from my life, people close to me insist that I waste my time on ads because they want to show me something but they were too lazy to install an adblocker. Ads are constantly being blasted from my parents’ and grandmother’s TV’s, they invade our computers, they even talk about ads at the dinner table. It breaks my heart.

              I know that my anti-advertisement position is a bit extreme, but I feel like I have to push back against the constant intrusions of capitalism into our personal lives, advertising being the primary front of this battle. Of course I’m willing to agree to disagree, but I still feel it necessary to debate this.

          • @settoloki@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            You know you’re not paying for “no ads” right? You’re simply using an alternative payment method. If somebody can’t afford something you’re suggesting we exclude them? Make it paid for only? The ads serve as payment for those without the means or are just unwilling to pay and still get the same options as everyone else. For someone that hates capitalism you’re sure good at preaching it.

            • @Misconduct@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              Whaaaat noooo. Silly. The dev should just cater to people with money or quit their source of income and be happy… Or something?

            • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              The ads serve as payment for those without the means or are just unwilling to pay and still get the same options as everyone else.

              That’s an interesting perspective. The way I see it though, the cost you pay in advertising, besides program functionality, is time. No matter how much money Jeff Bezos gets, eventually he will die. Your time is precious. Advertising is a waste of time on an unfathomable scale. I think that most people don’t fully understand the tradeoff they’re making by giving their time to advertisements because we’ve been conditioned not to think critically about how we use our time. This allows capitalists to easily exploit people into doing tedious work for them, saving them time. A lot of people assume that there’s a whole life after the lights go out, and they’re wasting their time under the assumption that their time in the afterlife will be infinite.

              If somebody can’t afford something you’re suggesting we exclude them?

              Generally speaking, no. I brought up some specific examples of reasonable ways to monetize software:

              • Custom feature request: you can pay the development cost for a large custom feature that becomes available to everyone. For example, let’s say I’m using an office software on x86-64, and I want the developers to port a version for ARM64 and help me deploy it on hundreds of Raspberry Pi’s. They’re probably not going to do that for free. Maybe someone else will do it, but if I need to make it happen, I’m willing to pay someone for their time! Ordinary bug fixes and feature requests for free customers would still be honored.

              • Luxury features: for example, icon packs [1], custom colors [1], and extra fonts. For each item, this only includes those items which don’t affect accessibility and function; for example, it wouldn’t be cool to charge extra for a Sans-Serif font option, because Sans-Serif fonts are, generally speaking, easier for low-vision people to read. However, I don’t think there would be too much of an issue with charging for some Sans-Serif font as long a reasonable selection of them are installed for free [2]. The full functionality of the app should be available to all users, including and especially those who can’t afford to pay.

              • Premium support for paying users: some users are going to require more support than others. For example, let’s say I want to deploy an office software on 1000 computers, and I want to get constant support for my users to transition to the software. In the current economic system, it absolutely makes sense to charge for that as a service under the assumption that, if you need that level of support, you can probably afford to pay for the required development time and manpower to take on such a large project and still have time to assist other users.

              Frankly, I think that people who cannot afford to pay for the software should simply get it for free. You shouldn’t have to pay in any way, cash or otherwise. The dev isn’t going to get a transaction if I can’t pay for it; might as well just give it away. If you don’t, I’m totally going to steal it anyways. Those who can pay probably should, and I will do so once I get a non-zero income.

              However, if you’re going to sell anything, I think it is least damaging to sell only those parts that users do not need to use the program. You shouldn’t sell any part of the program if you can avoid it, but if you can’t, sell the unimportant stuff.

              I suppose that if the choice is exclusively between paying with cash and paying by watching advertisements, and that choice is immutably carved into the fabric of the universe, then I suppose that it makes sense to have a choice [3]. However, it is my entire point that these are not the only options. One choice could be to not pay and just get it for free. This is the choice pirates will make, including myself. Another could be to pay some other way, or make some less damaging subset of the program be the item you pay for. Someone more creative than me could probably devise a more interesting business model.

              For someone that hates capitalism you’re sure good at preaching it.

              I appreciate critiques like these, but I will reiterate that I have absolutely no income at the moment, so I would be locked out of all the things I proposed. I’m not going to advocate for my own oppression. I’ve come up with those specific examples of monetization schemes as the least damaging I could think of.

              [1] If I remember correctly, Reddit tried a scam where they made the default icon obviously ugly and then charged for the one people want. Additionally, I understand that color schemes can be important for accessibility purposes, for example in the case of color blindness. My point is that there should be a reasonable amount of icons and theming to accomodate all users. Beyond that, it is least damaging to charge for additional cosmetic changes.

              [2] This is a feature I would be more likely to pay for because I’m really fucking picky about fonts. I’m low-vision myself, but as far as reading is concerned most of the traditional fonts work well enough; they just look kinda crappy.

              [3] In situations where these are imposed to be the only options, I elect not to use it. I’ve lost out on a lot of opportunities because of my opposition to advertisements, and more broadly capitalism!

  • @veroxii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    4211 months ago

    Surely we can agree it’s better to have too many choices rather than having some greedy piggy ban them all.

  • @jwagner7813@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3611 months ago

    One thing I didn’t like from Reddit, the elitism and gatekeeping posts from its users. OP, I’m right there with you.

  • @settoloki@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    3211 months ago

    It does seem like a large number of Lemmy users are elitist snobs. I thought this place was turning out better than Reddit, but it’s looking like I was wrong. People like that ruin platforms like this and sour the experience.

    • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      FOSS and focus on privacy does that to some people, they feel superior because they worry about those things they see as being beneficial.

      I’m sure many of the users from the before time were here specifically to not use a closed source, data gathering platform, so they’re a bigger proportion of users than they were on Reddit and they tolerate the most extreme elements of their community that also happen to be the most vocal.

      TL;DR: Reddit is for normies and now normies are on a platform where radicals were everywhere and part of the majority before they arrived.

      • @THED4NIEL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        711 months ago

        Sometimes those extreme privacy preachers remind me of doomsday preppers.

        I too reduced my data finger print, started using uBlock, thought more often if the data in a registration form is really needed for the service they provide (and didn’t register when in doubt), and so on…

        I don’t have Facebook, WhatsApp, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter (anymore), the only things I have are Reddit, Lemmy and Mastodon.

        Still I don’t inspect every bit going through my network with Wireshark and PiHole to see, if some packet sent while watching a movie may contain personal data. At some point you gotta live a little instead of full-time fear mongering, doomsday preaching for the tech apocalypse.

        I have reduced my digital fingerprints by a large margin with common sense, I don’t need a 100% privacy speedrun, what counts is that you do something. And the effects show, especially in the form of less spam and recommendations for items you’ll never need.

        Google knows which topics I search for, big whoop, wouldn’t be much of a search engine otherwise.

    • @faintedheart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      There are many entitled people here. Some of them are from linux community. Anything other than that is bad and 1000 posts related to that. Another is sync and other apps. Especially open source only good, closed source everything bad. My feed was full of that. Even though I am a sync user i feel angry when seeing so many non sense posts supporting and against that. Even some communities not related to these are posting this.

    • @Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The reason why many people swapped was because Lemmy harbors smarter individuals. I need to feel superior simply because I use Lemmy, Otherwise there’s no point.

    • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      -411 months ago

      I think a lot of you are confusing privacy focused to elitism.

      No data should ever go to a google server from Lemmy app ever.

      A lot of people seem to think the issue is that’s he’s charging for it.

      • @Stephen304@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1111 months ago

        Not wanting to use any app that goes to a google server for a lemmy app is being privacy focused. Telling other people their preference in not valuing the same thing is wrong is elitism - saying that no app should do something, and nobody else should use an app that does that thing, because you prefer it that way - that’s elitism.

        Sync and the people who like it aren’t invalid just because your preference is being privacy focused.

        Along the same lines, it’s totally possible to espouse the values of privacy to others without being elitist, as long as you aren’t talking down to other people or invalidating other people’s preferences, because that’s elitism.

  • @cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2811 months ago

    Shouldn’t an ethical human choose tools that do more good than harm? As long as an application does that, does it matter if it’s open source or not? The software we use in our daily lives is a personal choice and people shouldn’t be shamed for choosing a closed source application. Especially one created by an independent, craftsman software company. Sync, and other well-designed for-profit clients, benefit Lemmy, an open platform. That benefits all.

    Let me add, many of us are social media refugees, fleeing exploitative and closed platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and Facebook. There is also nothing wrong with continually evaluating the closed source solutions we choose to prevent repeating past mistakes.

    • @Misconduct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1811 months ago

      I don’t know about doing good or harm but I’ve used sync for reddit for years and years. The dev isn’t some big corporation and that’s generally enough for me. I’ll support them as long as their app has the experience that I prefer. I tried a few different apps until sync came out and I really gave them all a fair shot but none of them felt right. The fact that so many users bailed to Lemmy because Reddit broke third party apps and then turned around and got up people’s butts for using specific third party apps is kind of hilarious to me. A huge wave of users came here for sync etc and people are trying to push them away or bully them like reddit did? They might not be bullying for the same exact reason but it’s got the same vibe imo.

      • @havokdj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -1011 months ago

        Ironically, from what I’ve seen the sync users have been way more radical than the “anti-sync” users.

        Before you read this I cannot stress enough that I’m neutral in this, I’m just a little irritated that I’m now seeing this in basically every sub.

        There’s been examples of the reverse from both sides, but the fact that I am now seeing this spam about pointless shit like this on shitpost is proof of this.

        It is just an app, both of you. Sync dev should donate some profit (even as small as 1%) to Lemmy devs because his app relies on their software. App itself doesn’t have to be free but if it includes anti-features in the name of profits it is only fair, otherwise it is an exploitation of the GPL.

        Lemmy being a FOSS project with no ads running, it is pretty much up to devs pockets, instances pockets, and donations to keep the project going. If the sync developer is going to make money off of an app that essentially serves as a gateway to this service, ethically speaking he should contribute to it considering the software itself is what even makes the app function. If Lemmy were to shutdown, the app would be useless.

        Having been involved in the FOSS community for 18 years, the community heavily relies on the collaboration, contributions, and donations of those who partake in it. Without at least one of those things, the project dies, I have seen it hundreds of times now. Wherever you (all of you) may stand when it comes to FOSS, know that using Lemmy technically makes you a part of that community.

        We will see if the people here are sane or not by watching the karma of this post. If it is negative then the people in this argument are blinded by unnecessary rage and need to cool it.