• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My dream car: An EV version of the 1955 Nash Metropolitan, seen here in this silly ad photo:

    (Sorry, it’s hard to find pictures that give a true indication of the smallness of the car. Also, mine would be the red and white two tone variety.)

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yes!

      Even that was in an era or needlessly ego-boosting giant cars, going utilitarian to get a better product, better lives on average, even save resources - amazing (but with the cardinal sin of not being expensive enough and thus not as financially profitable).

      For the same reason I would love to get a normally viable car of much smol.

      Like a bit more modern version of Figaro:

      Or a sexy mid-engine Autozam:

      Kei cars are qewl!

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      As long as you only drive it on your own ranch, fine. But when you take your vehicle off your property, it becomes everyone else’s business.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    As it is the US has no pedestrian safety standards at the federal level. I’m pretty sure if GM wanted to put out a truck with running chainsaws all over it then it would be perfectly legal as far as the NHTSA is concerned, although some state regulators might have a problem with it which is probably why it doesn’t happen in reality.

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re in the process of describing a Cybertruck, just the misfitting panel ‘teeth’ aren’t rotating

  • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I have a Honda Fit (compact 4 seater) and absolutely LOVE the little car, plus it’s easier to park. But holy shit looking for a compact is hard! Everything is a fucking SUV or truck these days! Just count the number of sedans vs SUVs next time you’re out and about. My favorite cars, the 2 door Mini Cooper and VW Buggy, aren’t even made any more.

  • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This seems like it could lead to significant innovation in vans in North America, or set least US/Canada. Van pickups, van sedans, van Goghs? After the initial temper tantrums, I think people will buy whatever comes out of the design phase. There used to be a lot of “beef” about emission control devices, but not so much anymore. Those folks moved on.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Let’s target them in order to lower the demand for fossil fuels. The drivers of these vehicles are the ones driving up gas prices; and then subsequently crying about gas prices.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Why do little cars have to withstand a collision with a huge truck but trucks just get bigger and bigger? The new Hummer is over 9,000lbs (4,090 kg)

    • krippix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      wtf in Europe that thing couldn’t be driven with a regular class B drivers license

    • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Regardless of truck size, I don’t think tractor trailers are going anywhere. Even if we made trucks smaller those would still be out there

      Smaller trucks would still get in accidents though, and I imagine they would be less deadly

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Man, if only we could separate freight from commuter traffic. Like, imagine if all those tractor trailers were on their own separate road, but make it out of, IDK, metal or something so it can withstand the weight better. You could even just have metal right under the wheels, to reduce costs. But what do I know, I’m just some pie in the sky nobody who doesn’t know what he’s talking about

        • MasterMediasRes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          That sounds like a neat idea—here’s a wild thought, what would happen if we tried the same thing with passengers? Eh, you’re right, sounds positively un-American.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Tractor trailers are heavily regulated with training, licensing, driving hours and sleep break logging etc. Are they really a significant source of pedestrian collisions?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You should check out the safety stuff with them and cars. You’ll stay near one on the road again.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Even if we made trucks smaller those would still be out there

        If we made them smaller there’d just be more of them on the road. There’d also be higher prices for everything to compensate for the extra expense of having those extra trucks and bodies to pilot them.

      • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean they’re getting heavier, but not, like, whole number multiples heavier. An electric might be some 60% heavier than a comparable gas car. But the aforementioned hummer is more than 5 times heavier than even a heavy electric “utility vehicle”. That’s more than 400% heavier.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Huh? Are you saying heavy electric utility vehicles are less than 2k lbs? I think you’re math is a bit off, or I’m misunderstanding you. 9k lbs is heavy but it’s only around 2k lbs heavier than it’s gas counter parts (most SUVs are around 6.5-7k lbs). Most electric cars are 1-2k lbs heavier than their gas counterparts already. Batteries are not light.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            I’m saying smaller cars are usually lighter than bigger cars, even when the smaller cars are electric. And the car I was comparing to was the Chevrolet bolt “electric utility vehicle” that’s trying to be an electric SUV. Which, yeah, is 1600 lbs.

            Where a Ford fiesta that’s almost the same size is still 1100.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have conservative family members who deliberately go for the biggest SUV with the lowest gas mileage available just to “stick it to the government.” If the government told them that they couldn’t drive a small car, they’d be out there shopping for a small car. It’s incredibly childish.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, a lot of stupid culture war crap is now tied up into the car your own.

      If people actually prioritized performance, handling, visability, cost to drive, and cabin features, then a LOT of people would probably be better off with a sedan.

      If you don’t need the space, you can get so much more bang for your buck with a smaller car. The $10k more you spend on the larger form factor could go toward a nicer power train and cabin luxury features.

      • Or a hatchback or a station wagon…

        Oops, nobody makes station wagons anymore. We stopped making them because, uh, people stopped buying them. Yeah, that’s the ticket. People stopped buying them because we stopped making them.

      • Hobbes
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Most other countries I’ve been to, all the trades use these, and seem to have no problem getting projects done.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Let’s ignore the lack of crush zones, air bags, seat belts, re-enforced door panels and cabin pillars, for a moment. (The lack of any safety features is why they are mostly illegal to operate on roads in the US.)

          How far do you think that roller skate could pull my empty 24,000lbs tandem axle tilt bed trailer? Or even my 4000lbs trailer? On a highway at highway speeds.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ya know it probably says something that the concept of “cabin luxury features” made we want to burn the inside of a car. Ill stick to my lack of cupholders in my 30 year old car thanks, but seriously when I see the interior of modern cars they make me want to rip into them with wire cutters. Bunch of useless crap like lane assist, cruise control, and addaptive road assist, powered stearing is the only luxury I need.

        Fun fact I am only 24, I just am tech literate in the way that causes me to think 90% of technology is worthless crap that shouldve never been created and needs to be recycled.

        • ensoniqthehedgehog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          36 minutes ago

          I’m almost 40 and a lot of my cars in my teens and 20s were from the '80s and '90s. Almost everything I’ve owned has had at least a rudimentary cruise control although there are some ('80s Bronco II, '95 Miata, early '90s 240sx, 99 Impreza Wagon) where it was broken or I just never used it.

          All that said, I LOVE the radar controlled cruise control on my current vehicle. I’ve used it for at least 20,000 miles of driving at this point. Interstate, highway, city, you name it… Pretty much any time I want to maintain a steady speed over 28 and there’s not a lot of stop and go traffic. I hate thinking about life without it now (and I hate using standard cruise control without radar)!

          • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I love cruise control. Get on the highway, set it and go. Ideally find someone driving the same direction and speed, and follow along behing them. No more stressing that I’m going to get a speeding ticket.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          True. I’m mostly saying that you could probably take that cash and upgrade to a nicer car that isn’t covered in creaking injection molded plastic inside, or something with nicer seats and upholstery.

          AKA decent materials, and not the cheap garbage you get on a base model American SUV.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I get that its just the concept disgusts me, but then again my Scottish ancestors would rise from the dead and kill me for wasting money on such superfluous things. Profligacy is quite literally killing the planet, ya aint gonna catch me wasting money on stupid pointless shit too often. My grandmother though aint bound by such ancestral limits and it annoys me.

      • TownhouseGloryHole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Astounding. Hummer H2 beating the Sierra by 3m is incredible. A truck designed almost exclusively to express how selfish you are and it has better viability.

          • pemptago@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            GM marketing. They purchased the hummer brand from AM General. OG Hummer (later renamed H1) was based on AM General’s military Humvee design, but released to the civilian market. H2 and H3 were designed by GM for mass marketing. Can be seen in the price. H1 nearly 10x more than H2 and H3.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That’s not to mention the optics.

      https://www.quora.com/Where-does-the-M1-Abrams-have-the-optics-of-its-main-cannon-I-dont-know-anything-about-tanks

      #4 is the optic for the RWS. This cannot be used to aim the main gun, but it can be used as an alternate form of CITV, especially since it’s so damned high off the ground, it may be able to see over obstacles. Not as good as CITV in the thermal range, though.

      That being said, some civilian vehicles are gonna have their own camera systems too, so…

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Civilian vehicles should all have thermals and a night driving HUD. If I’m paying 30,000 dollars then they can damn well put some actual stuff in there. Headlights being weaponized isn’t something we have to tolerate.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This is misleading because being higher up you can see much better further ahead, and over obstacles and barriers. Your special awareness is much better at distances that are relevant for avoiding collisions. If something is 1.5m away its too late anyway.

      The angle is also incorrect because they are putting the eyes of the driver straight in line with the hood, which is not how its been in any vehicle I’ve ever driven, the head should be higher or further forward.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        You don’t want to see “over” obstacles close to your vehicle when said obstacles are in fact human beings standing in front of your car.

        At parking lot speeds, 1.5 meters is also not “too late,” and it certainly isn’t when you are at a standstill but need to determine if it is safe to move or if there is a small person in front of your vehicle, i.e. in the school pickup line, or in a parking lot, or your own driveway.

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The origin of the line is at head height…

        Also these vehicles gain in distant visibility at the expense of everyone else on the road, blocking their views.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          The best way to avoid getting into an accident is to see it long before you get there. But situational awareness is not something the vast majority of drivers actually practice or have…

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Humans have quite literally invented cars that are better at killing people, especially children.

    “I don’t want children to die in accidents,” say people as they drive huge masses of metal that might do just that.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ll keep driving my PEV Minivan that has 360 cameras and I can see in front of me easily. I care about children’s lives, unlike bubba in his lifted pickup truck. Why do you need a 4x4 lifted 3 feet and you live in the suburbs?

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        …you know what they say about guys with big lift…

        Funny thing is, the people I know with large vehicles around here always bemoan how difficult it is to park, yet don’t want to solve the obvious problem because twice a year they want to haul a fridge to the dump or pick up something from the home improvement store rather than have it delivered or rent a truck for an hour.

        • socphoenix@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Counting the differences in cost (loan, gas, expected maintenance, insurance etc) it came out to where I would have to use the truck to haul something at least a very weekend possibly more to break even with a much newer car vs just renting a truck once or twice a year. Pickups are almost universally owned by people too stupid for middle school math imo.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          always bemoan how difficult it is to park

          I’ve made multuple older men incredibly upset by laughing at them when they say this

          They get pissy and respond with “well you’re some skinny long haired hippie who drives an EV so what do you know?” Which, yeah, all of that is true

          But then I pull up the pictures of me 4x4ing in the rain and snow through fire smoke at work, pointing out that I drove a RAM3500 fully kitted out and lifted with a giant set of 4 110g tanks in the bed blocking anything other than my mirror and cam view, yet I only had issues parking when people didn’t know how to stay in their own lines, and that I regularly had to squeeze my truck into areas with an inch or less of clearance in order to do my fucking job on a construction site, and I never hit anything but a rock (downhill, someone left a fucking rug out on some dirt in the rain and when my truck hit it I just slid til I hit the rock, company deemed me blameless)

          They usually get flustered and change the subject p quick at that point

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Why do you need a 4x4 lifted 3 feet and you live in the suburbs?

        Penis issue

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yes, but mini vans aren’t lifted 20 ft off the ground with absurdly huge hoods for no apparent reason.

          The reason trucks and SUVs are killing kids is because you can see a 4ft tall person that isn’t standing 100 yards in front. These are the only vehicles with this problem.

          • dafo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            But it’s still blocking the view for us in normal sizes cars.

            I don’t know how many times I’ve had to hope for the best and carefully inch forwards/backwards when being next to a minivan/SUV/pickup. I’ve been close to being in an accident a number of times because of, well mostly, SUVs.

          • niucllos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Additionally, the raised and blunt hood height makes a full-body impact with no force dissipation much more likely, particularly for shorter people, where a more traditional hood shape allows a struck pedestrian to roll over the top and avert some of the force of the strike

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            20-foot lifted vehicles would probably be considerably safer:

            1. They’d easily have the clearance to safely navigate over most pedestrians in their path.
            2. Any attempts to balance them well would be incredibly expensive and you’d likely have many drivers whose cars would fall over from insufficiently sized tires or whatever.

            Hmmm… 🤔 Now that I think about it, maybe we should subsidize these lift kits to make this a self-solving problem

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Driving a truck and not wanting children to die in accidents are in-fact not in conflict with each other. Or are you implying that truck drivers do want them to die?

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        No, but it clearly isn’t important enough to them to influence their choice.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Driving a truck and not wanting children to die in accidents are in-fact not in conflict with each other.

        Then design trucks which are not as deadly to pedestrians on impact.

  • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s out of control. I drive a 2019 Kona and I moved to that from my 2013 Elantra. Last time I was at the dealer was looking at the new Konas and they’re bigger, too big for me.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The most jarring thing is when I was picking up a prescription for my cat, and on the way home I was driving next to a plain vanilla, factory-stock GMC truck whose hood was literally taller than my entire car. And I don’t drive a miata or some other sub-compact, I drive a freaking Nissan Leaf, so about the size of your average sedan.

      Since then it’s like a switch flipped in my brain, and I can’t unsee just how insanely huge modern-day pickup trucks have gotten.