• muse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    1 year ago

    And commence 45 days of no Speaker so they can crash the system by not being able to pass the budget

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the GOP would have to keep all their members in the house in case the democrats comes with a motion to name a speaker by themselves when there outnumber republicans in the house.

            • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because there are more Republicans in the house right now and they didn’t vote for him.

                • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, they meant the democrats nominated him, or put him forward as their candidate for speaker. Not that he won the vote.

                • pips@lemmy.film
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If there is a quorum in the chamber but more Democrats than Republicans present, in theory they could successfully vote for a Democratic Speaker while in the minority. There is nothing that says the Speaker of the House has to be a member of the party that holds the majority. However, Republicans/the Speaker Pro Tem will almost definitely make sure this doesn’t happen. I say almost definitely because, as we’ve seen, they’re not that great at strategy these days.

            • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because Dems don’t have the majority. Jeffries was often the top vote getter during the speaker voting in January, though, since the Republican coalition is fracturing, much like now. Plurality doesn’t get you the speaker’s gavel, though.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the non-Fredumb Cuckoo’s in the Republican party actually come to an agreement with the Democrats on a speaker, as they should, then they could.

          At this point though the entire Republican party is more concerned with people’s genitals and reproduction than governing.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that’s probably why they did it. They’d only need a handful of moderates to join them in the vote; and it kind of sounds like they’ve been making deals in the background.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          The House sets its own rules at the beginning of every Congress. There’s no reason a speaker has to agree to the demands that they can be removed via motion by one single member of Congress.

          It certainly wasn’t an option during the last Congress, while Pelosi was Speaker. It also shouldn’t be a demand Democrats should ever cave to when nominating their own candidate.

          McCarthy did this all to himself.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speaker Jefferies wins seat after making stunning deal with a handful of Republicans to avoid a government shutdown.

      Under the special agreement, Jeffries will be subject to the same rule of one person being able to table a motion to remove him, much like McCarthy, but not until a budget has been passed by congress and signed by Biden.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s already a speaker pro tempore. It’s an automatic process based on names submitted by McCarthy in January.