The federal and provincial governments have been underfunding universities for decades. Recently, universities were able to start recruiting foreign students to make up for the shortfall, but it looks like that money tap will be turned down. It doesn’t look like there’s a plan to make up for it.

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That’ll be tough if universities see their income crater.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yea, this is stupid. One of my clients is a public college, and they’re already hurting. They already cut a bunch of programs to save the rest. A new round of international student cuts is going to gut so many more that they just worked so hard to save.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Our politicians are incredibly short sighted. It’s amazing that the same budget both defunds universities and says we want to attract the “best and the brightest” to those same universities.

      • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s annoying the only real choices are business daddy, or business daddy that’s deiniftely a bigoted racist.

        • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yup, Neo-liberal or full blown Nuremberg. Easy choice but we’re still getting fucked. We need ranked choice voting and proportional representation but how do you get our parliament to vote through a resolution that endangers a lot of their safe seats.

          • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            We were so close with Trudeau. He was elected entirely on the back of that promise and everyone knew it. All we had to do was hold his feet to the fire when he tried to weasel out of it after getting the majority that left him no reasonable excuse for not following through. But we all know what happened. He later even said his biggest regret was not following through on electoral reform. Well, yeah. I’m not sure I believe him, but if he’s telling the truth I hope it fucking haunts him. It should. I’ll certainly never forgive him.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Business daddy is telling Canada we are not productive enough, but refuses to fix that with R&D spending. A bunch of oxy addicts with back hoes is not a stable future economy, Carney knows that.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    As clearly this thread has no clue what goes on at universities, or even knows the difference between universities and colleges, I’ll explain the OPs point.

    $1.7B for 1000 scientist is $1.7M each, for 5 years in total. For senior scientists, this covers salary. But now we have 1000 extra grant applications in a system that is funded at 20% the level of the US per capita. This means we will try and recruit Americans, but tell them they will have an under 10% chance of getting any grant money, and that grant size is half a typical NIH or NSF grant. Large projects? Zero. This research has to be done somewhere, which costs universities money. The same universities getting squeezed by frozen tuitions the last 6 years.

    So it is a designed bullshit line item. No one will access this because by the time it rolls out to real funds, the US will have reverted funding and going back to trouncing this banana republic. Excellence, why would an established scientists move to a poorly funded system? They will get more done of they just ride the storm in US.

    This money goes to cancer and disease research, like lipid nanoparticles that saved millions of lives with COVID vaccines (yes, that came from Canada), or neural network algorithms driving trillions in investment, also from Canada, but we just pissed away that IP to the US for a handful of shiny rocks.

    If Carney is serious about CDN productivity, he needs to fund R&D at per capita levels closer to US or China and make sure the result of this research is developed in Canada, not just sold off cheap to the US as per the last 60 years. A decent economist would realize there is tremendous potential return on investment, far higher than subsidies for pickup truck production to US corporations, and certainly more than the 100-150x more we waste on military spending which does nothing for the CDN economy.

    This does not affect colleges. They don’t do research and are for vocational training.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Centrists and conservatives don’t have the capacity to understand “return on investment” or “in-direct benefits”. Carney is saving money by not paying the bills, so to speak, and that only works until the first of the month rolls around.

      I’m so sick of seeing the research and case studies pile up which show all the easy, low-risk solutions to most of our problems just for those morons to bust in and keep doing the same worthless bullshit.

  • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    O boo hoo, Universities don’t need unlimited growth. So what if they make less this year than they did last year. They are not hurting, only their unrestricted growth is threatened.

    • honc@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Universities are non-profit organizations in Canada. I agree that they don’t need unlimited growth, but the consequence of not funding them is a decrease in the quality of education and the country’s ability to be at the forefront of research.

      They are absolutely hurting right now, btw. One consequence of this is some (small) amount of improved efficiency, but the reality if this continues is a degradation of post-secondary education.

      For example, more and more high school students will struggle to get into good programs, and then eventually, we just won’t have good programs.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’re hurting because they got addicted to international student funding and grew to ridiculous size, then that funding dried up and they don’t want to shrink back down to normal size.

        It’s like a person being fed all-you-can-eat fried chicken and milkshakes, gaining 300 lbs, then being put on a healthy diet and complaining they’re hungry all the time.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            They got fucked by a model forced on them by McGuinty, then yanked out from them by Ford. In 4 years, there will not be room to train students as programs retract.

            Ontario’s university system has been the only driver of the economy since the 60s producing thousands of engineers and scientists. But does a high school diploma Premiere understand that? Or does he have a personal problem with post secondary education he flunked out of in 1984?

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Isn’t growing universities a good thing? It seems to me that giving everyone access to a university education would be highly beneficial to the people.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Universities have grown way beyond what they need to for the domestic student population. This is growth squarely aimed at international students who pay 5-10x what domestic students pay in tuition. Cut off the tap of international students and you end up with huge unused capacity and budget shortfalls.

  • olbaidiablo @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s a good thing that university funding is provincial. Maybe they should stop cutting the funding and giving it to rich people, I’m looking at you Doug Ford.

  • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Most collegiate institutions in Canada have been going gangbusters for 20 years building new facilities and just generally being stupid with money, cutting down on tenured professors, loading up on administrators.

    Like. Maybe some very poor decisions have been made for which there are consequences.

    If they were underfunded and hurting for money then why would we do this? If they’re underfunded and hurting for money now then why would we provide it when they were so irresponsible with it?

    There could be nuance to this situation i don’t understand but from my POV our higher educational institutions need to get their fucking shit together.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The one I have as a client has only built a new trades building and a new nursing building in the last 10 years, both for super in-demand programs. As far as I can tell they’re not overly top heavy in any way.

      Maybe certain institutions were being stupid, but it’s definitely not all of them.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The ignorance here is incredible, and reeks of failed students, or people who drank through a 3 year BA in art history. The Canadian Foundation Institute was established 20 years ago to partner with provinces to build badly needed infrastructure for research.

      Those “facilities” you are whining about are for research on disease or new technology that is the driving force of the economy. These insitutions are a great net stimulus of billions for new technology and business. New fried chicken franchises are not the future economy.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    At the same time, the feds want to

    recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

    That’ll be tough if universities see their income crater.

    What do you think the $1.7B is supposed to cover?

    They’re trying to end low tier colleges just pumping through international students to inflate their financials, and instead trying to poach all the H1-B researchers in the US that are being scared away.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The $1.7 B is a temporary measure to fund researcher salaries and research costs. They plan to recruit 1000 into a system that already has dwindling grant support and 12% grant success rates with 30% budget cuts. Even if anyone moved here for this, they will just moved back to the US once funding is restored in 36 months, so all Carney is doing is giving US science $1.7B to generate IP that will be developed in the US eventually, while ignoring scientists and engineers in Canada.

      The US spent 4X per capita on science than Canada before Trump, and they have the computing and biotech industries worth trillions to show for it.

      You can’t just move 1000 into Canada without more infrastructure because research already costs insitutions money.

      Not sure where this fantasy of Professors lighting cigars with $100 bills is coming from, other than very few on Lemmy seem to be aware at what goes on in these insitutions.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The $1.7 B is a temporary measure to fund researcher salaries and research costs.

        It’s $134 million over three years to bring doctoral and post doctoral students over from the US, which isn’t temporary, and doesn’t mean it will end in three years, it just means that’s how far out they’ve budgeted funding for at the moment. They’re not going to be doing a detailed budget for these years out from now so it’s entirely likely that program will just get extended if it’s successful.

        Then it’s $1B over 13 years in new grants, which may not be as much as the US, but is not nothing and is not temporary.

        And lol if you think researchers are going to want to go back to the US or will be welcome back to the US in the short to mid term. They elected Trump on two non-consecutive occassions. If those researchers don’t come here they’re going to the EU, UK, Korea, Japan, India, etc.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Somehow I doubt their budgets shortfall and spending choices are only because government wont give these private for profit institutions enough free money.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Almost all Canadian Universities (and the ones we are really talking about here) are all non-profit. They reinvest any profits back into the institution to improve their capacity for research. This is why Canada has some of the world’s leading research universities. They are not profiting to make individual people richer, they are profiting to make society and our future richer.

      This is starting to change though. There are unfortunately a growing number of for-profit “universities” in the country but most of them are transparently low quality diploma-mills (which is a whole different problem that needs dealing with) and aside from misleading naive domestic and mostly international students and separating them from their money, they remain of very marginal educational or research significance. That may not continue though unless we do something to support our large majority of non-profit universities.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I watched my local college lose all its credibility as a result of running borderline scams for foreign students. My old university otoh has been rather smart about not becoming too dependent on foriegn student tuition. I love immigration, and especially think exporting our education is a good thing, but the way these programs have been run in recent years is a cancer on these institutions and pure short term thinking. I’d rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

      Actual reform would be the way to go.

      UofT appears to have done a good job of keeping their books balanced, despite the glut of foreign students, but many others have not.

  • ValueSubtractedA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s the perfect crime! The feds create a problem with a solution that’s under provincial jurisdiction…

    • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know about other provinces, but here in Ontario, the provincial government created the problem. Tuition has been frozen to 2019 levels and they reduced direct funding to universities and colleges. The “solution” was to massively ramp up international student enrollment, which came with a lot of other issues.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem was created by Provinces cutting funds to universities and education in general… Universities made up the shortfall by using International Students which was a Federally enabled escape valve.

      This has been the game of mostly conservative Provincial Premiers; cut everything and blame it on the Feds.

      I do feel for some of the legit universities but from what I see, the vast majority of the money milked from International Students did not go to improve the level of education (barely has moved in the last few years) and mostly went to “Mall universities” which are borderline a scam, all stamped and approved by the Provincial gov.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      A pleasant reversal from the usual situation. Like, all the regulations that sandbag against housing are municipal, which can only be overridden by the provinces.

  • Canuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There is too much bloat. I’ve seen first hand essentially glorified admins being paid $130k + full pension. They need to trim the fat at these places and restructure operations to get rid of all the waste.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago
      1. No public institutions in Canada pay the pensions of people employed there. The pension funds are user contributed and the mandatory contributions allow no RESP savings.

      2. Many departments between education and research have budgets exceeding $100M/yr…you want to put that in the hands of anyone making under $250K? Good luck.

      Back to the National Post comment section with you.

      • Canuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago
        1. I don’t want secretaries, alumni officers, event planners, making $130k, and being able to comfortably retire at 55 on a defined benefit plan, no.

        2. Plenty of MBAs in this country that manage budgets larger than that, make less than half that with no pension.

        Sounds like you’re the only one that reads that paper between the two of us

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Both for this and for healthcare.

      The nurses are struggling to get a fair deal while somehow the billions a year put into healthcare goes where exactly?

      Not to the front line staff, I’ll tell you that much.

      And I get it, materials and equipment isn’t cheap but between nurses salaries and material costs, and the occasional multi-million dollar piece of equipment… I just don’t see where it’s all being spent. Between the middle and upper management, there needs to be an overhaul.

      Education on every level isn’t dissimilar.

      Hell, most government services need a review, at the very least.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah that won’t happen. Senior admin bloat is like crack cocaine for universities and colleges.

    • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Got that right. The head of our local college was making $400,000 a year before he retired. This is a small town college not a university, and that kind of income is ridiculously high for a college president in a town of 60,000. Thats double what our premier makes.

      On the other hand, I did a little digging and compared to other English speaking nation universities, Canada is actually bottom of the list for paying our university presidents: https://higheredstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Figure-6.png

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are lots and lots of Universities all over the world pushing out hard working, intelligent people for which there are not even close to enough jobs. Make it make sense.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, there are enough jobs, it’s just that most companies would rather pay one overworked person to pull 60hr weeks to pump out mediocre work before burning out and being replaced than pay two happy and productive people to work 40hr weeks or, heaven forbid, three people to work 30-32hr weeks with a huge bump in moral and producitivity.

      We got the money, we got the people, and we got the evidence that backs it all up.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I know people who were qualified for graduate school, but did not get in. Mainly because foreign students pay better. There would actually be a more diverse/enjoyable university experience if more Canadians (say at least half of students) were admitted.

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most rigorous studies show that immigration is to the net financial benefit of a nation but the increase of foreign students in Canada is really just a story of capitalist greed. The quality of education is far too low for the cost of tuition and I’d argue its an extremist capitalist position to expect infinite growth from a nations productivity and to see decreasing fertility as an existential threat.

      Now it’s complicated in Canada because social services are funded by the current tax payer base and Boomers are about to decimate the healthcare system as they get older and sicker. But bringing folks over on false pretenses is not the solution to that.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s completely false and fabricated. Firstly, foreign students are capped at 8%. Secondly, they pay more tuition, but the institution does not get any government co-funding. Thirdly, in science, students are paid minimum stipends around $30K a year, so space on limited by research funding support, at which Canada is the lowest per capita of the G8. There is a level of demonstrated excellence to get into grad programs, not just a place to spend 5 more years to get a piece of paper.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Firstly, foreign students are capped at 8%

        Is that a new cap? Just for graduate schools? It’s been a while since my annecdote or Uni experience.