• zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, what’s the alternative here? The Swiss government, which they are subject to, issued a legal warrant. Any email provider you want to use will be subject to warrants. All of them.

    They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data. In this case they were able to provide personally identifying payment data because the person paid for their account with… a credit card. They offer crypto payment options, and would not have been able to usefully comply had the person used that method.

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I get the sentiment, but no serious company is going to survive for very long lying to its government when it receives search warrants. This is not a realistic solution.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mailfence has no idea who I am.

      Tuta never got any payment info outta me, though I do use them for official things tied to my actual id… but only those things, not other things.

      ???

      The alternative is to use an alternative.

      They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data.

      Fucking obviously not, this is far from the first time something like this happened.

      They could, you know, design the services they offer such that they are actually incapable of complying with warrants, by design.

      Payment info is the easiest, most direct way to identify a person, beyond uploading your actual government ID.

      Maybe, maybe Proton should stop acting like that is not fucking obviously the case, maybe they should make it more clear that if your threat model includes, I dunno, a terroristic theocratic fascist government, their currently existing marketing is extremely misleading to tech-normies?

      • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you pay for mailfence with card, they know who you are.

        Also, I’m pretty sure that proton do not have unencrypted email contents of their users. That’s why they can’t offer IMAP like everyone else does (you can’t connect your email client directly to proton, you need an extra app).

        Also, I think that proton’s marketing is pretty in-line with what they actually offer. Protection from e.g. data breaches should be quite good and I think it’s reasonable to primarily market to people who are not directly targeted by the US government.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Who pays for mailfence?

          Why would you?

          I think it’s reasonable to primarily market to people who are not directly targeted by the US government.

          Then you’re either an idiot or are somehow blissfully ignorant of everything related to Peter Thiel and Palantir.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Basically all they did was provide the credit card information because that’s the only information they had saved. It’s not like they just gave them his email or something like that. It’s one of the biggest reasons they let you use crypto to pay for your subscription.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        For thoroughness’ sake, here are all of Proton’s payment methods.

        They accept:

        • Debit/credit
        • PayPal
        • Google Pay
        • Bitcoin
        • Cash (mailed)
        • Bank transfer

        If I were making an email address for a group allegedly connected to “arson, vandalism and doxing”, I would’ve definitely gone with Bitcoin. The fact that all PM were able to do in the face of Swiss authorities acting at the behest of the FBI was connect the email address to the payment source – and that this one piece of information was easily preventable by the activist – is an endorsement to me.

        • Zidane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          arson, vandalism and doxing

          Wiki guy doesn’t believe in the Oxford comma, you disgust me

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Bitcoin is not anonymous. If you went with Bitcoin, they could trace all the transactions from the time it was minted. If they can get back to a known address, they can very likely trace it forward to you.

          On this list of payment methods, mailed cash is probably the most anonymous. They may theoretically be able to trace it back to your general region, but it would be difficult.

          • exaybachae
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can launder Bitcoin, and you can use unaffiliated bitcoin wallets.

            I have a couple wallets that I’ve only ever accessed with VPN, and I can buy anonymous coins on one, transfer anonymously to the other, then swap for another type of coin and spend from there.

            There are some gas fees and conversion costs, but vs jail I’d happily pay them.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can launder, but the nature of the block chain is that all transactions are public and permanent. If your laundry service is compromised two years from now, the transaction you conduct today is also compromised.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    helped FBI adhered to Swiss legal requirements

    Are you guys expecting companies to break the laws of their own countries on your behalf?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, just expecting honest, straightforward marketing.

      Here’s an example:

      Hey we do E2EE and shit, but if you pay us for it, and the US government gets mad at you, we’ll fuck you.

      There, see?

      Honest, simple.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, from your perspective, all companies should include, in their marketing campaigns, that they wont break the law for you? lol

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          When their marketing is based on privacy, they need to be honest that they’re not going to be private.

          I recall other companies using “canaries” to help their customers know that they had been compromised by the government but were legally not allowed to talk about it.

  • Retail4068@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh, proton caved to government warrant? ./mild shock

    Idiots expect them to pay salaries while ignoring government suppeona 🤦‍♂️. I was screeched at on a banned account.