• SanderTuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 months ago

      You would be right. I have the same packs. I don’t know if I bought old stock, but I bought the pack with the blue lid recently, the black lid pack is older.

      The black lid pack contains bee wax and more water than the blue lid pack (64% vs 57% of the natural ingredients).

        • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It depends. Many vegans see any product that “exploits” animals as nonvegan. That includes things like down feathers, wool and honey.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not sure how Wool exploits animals, shearing sheep is good for their health as I understand it (keeping them from growing things, or getting too heavy/waterlogged to move and just… laying there and dying, amomgst other things.)

            • moody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              31
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sheep are selectively bred for their wool. Before humans started doing so, wild sheep did just fine without the need for shearing. So it’s pretty similar to milk in that if you don’t milk a modern dairy cow it will suffer, that doesn’t make milk an ethical product.

            • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              After a few sheers they’re off to the slaughterhouse once the wool quality degrades. The sheering is not for their benefit.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thirding the notion that it’s definitely not “mat” in the US. A mat is something you put on the ground, Matt is my cousin’s ex-fiance, and matte is a surface finish with little to no shine.

      Really don’t know what people say English is hard to learn, we use the same word for so many things that there’s fewer words to learn /s

    • ColonelPanic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      From the UK. I’ve never seen matte spelled as matt. CA, UK and AU are generally pretty close with spelling, whereas the US is usually off doing its own thing. It’s a similar thing to blonde and blond.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            I shit you not, that is the etymological distinction between the two.

            How strictly that distinction is observed is an open question.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            If they’re non-binary, you’re going to be so anxious about using the right pronouns that you won’t even notice their hair color.

            Edit: it’s a joke answer, people, in response to a joke question. It’s not made at the expense of any marginalized individual or group. The only people who would be anxious about the situation are allies; the 'phobes don’t give a shit. Untwist yer knickers.

            • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Nah, most enbys are chill and recognize that pronouns can be easy to forget. You’re just upset that people get annoyed when you repeatedly misgender them.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I had firsthand experience when an enby stayed at our place for a while. My old Gen X self had trouble remembering to use the correct pronouns sometimes, but it got easier with practice. Decades of using only binary pronouns for individuals takes time to unlearn.

                • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’ll be honest, it took me a while to start remembering “they/them”, even for myself. However, now I have the opposite problem, which is that I tend to substitute “they/them” for gendered pronouns. Normally that’s not a problem because most people accept neutral pronouns, but some people can be very picky about their pronouns and then I have to remember that “they/them” can’t be universally applied to everyone.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now I’m not saying anything, but I dated a Matt, and he did produce a lot of paste… I’d have to run the numbers to see if it’s viable for mass-production though.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Chamber’s dictionary has it as “Mat, or Matt, or matte” stating that it comes from the French “mat” or the German “matt”, so fuck knows where matte comes from!

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The American spelling “matte” probably comes from the spelling “mate” derived from French “mate”, and doubling the “t” to differentiate it from “mate”. The British spelling “matt” was probably primarily influenced by the German word “Matt” considering the UK tended to have more German influence.

          Alternatively, either (or both) may be an etymological spelling from Latin “mattus” (which means “drunk” but likely became a word for “pale” in French).

          While I am a linguist, I only deduced this from a bit of Googling and a lot of speculating, so don’t take my word for it…

        • P1nkman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Probably my Stavanger-dialect in Norway. It’s matt in Norwegian, but matte in my dialect.

  • The2b@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s no longer labeled vegan. A lot of producers actively avoid the label, despite the fact that the Vegan Society would provide their stamp of approval. I’ve heard somewhere putting it on your product lowers sales. All this to say, are you certain it’s actually not vegan anymore?

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I ran an experiment a few years ago at a party I hosted. I had two trays of Oreos. One labeled ‘Oreos’, the other labeled ‘Vegan Oreos’. Now, Oreos are vegan, but aren’t labeled as such. I had to refill the standard Oreos a couple times throughout the night. The ‘Vegan’ labeled tray ended the night with more than half still there. Vegan definitely plays a role in sales, and not always for the best.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s interesting! I also wonder if its a legal shielding technique to abandon the “vegan” label in case one of their upstream suppliers changes without notifying the manufacturer. If you never claim it to be vegan, you’ve in no danger of violation.

      • The2b@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Vegan is not a regulated term. Plenty of products that say they are vegan still have animal products, such as honey.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are people that hold specific definitions of the term “vegan”. If you never use the word, you can never run afoul of anyone’s definition.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reason the vegan label lowers sales is that smart people already read the product label, so they know it’s vegan either way. Lazy people who don’t like thinking need to be told that something is vegan. Vegans tend to be smart, and vegan-haters tend to hate thinking.

  • MadLegoChemist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    It looks like the 91% natural ingredients version has benzyl alcohol as a preservative which is typically synthetically derived and in my experience can drastically shift the bio-based ratio.

    As far as I can see, the rest of the ingredients are the same, but the sourcing of those ingredients could be different which could also shift the naturally derived percentage.

      • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Show me a gel/spray that isn’t. They are all going to be some form of ‘sticky,’ which means some form bonding, likely protein or carbohydrate based. Either of those will take oil from your hair when removed/washed off, and are obviously interacting with the keratin itself to create all the stickiness between hair strands.

      • MadLegoChemist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I haven’t heard that before but I don’t work on hair care products very often. Benzyl alcohol is used as a preservative in lots of cosmetic products though. It can be considered an allergen for some people, but overall it’s pretty safe (as far as we know so far).

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wouldn’t even be surprised if this is just a shift in marketing. The “Vegan” label, in particular, has fallen out of style as more and more men become obsessed with meat-based diets.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Keto, paleo, whatever the roid king is doing. The share of people picking that up and going “ew, vegan, it’ll probably turn me into a soy boy” is probably bigger than the share of people who only buy vegan products, OR the savings of cutting those 6% of natural ingredients are worth losing the latter share of buyers. Bottom line is the company’s bottom line.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think you might have gotten old stock when you bought a ‘new’ tin. When I look on their website, it only has the vegan formulation listed, and the ingredients do appear to be derived from non-animal sources.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You are showing them backwards - the NEW formulation is the one that says vegan. Did you buy the second one at Big Lots or something?

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was about two make a whole lecture about percentage points but it just so happens it actually is ~6% less in this case.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I save my ear wax and just reuse that for hair paste. You need one of the gyroscope cleaners though to get enough wax.